From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755454AbZFKRF3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:05:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752560AbZFKRFW (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:05:22 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f214.google.com ([209.85.217.214]:41443 "EHLO mail-gx0-f214.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752542AbZFKRFV (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:05:21 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=nH1nCbKClz9DOV79ssCTvNgt/0QSK/0LqHlwnnlaB+tD6x0zJW71wcbiV4w8RfrPTG Tuq3B+juruR0/zsB0liA3WaWr0e2zacuThERBuy4h527U0GwWc9az9X/p0LyhyLISh/X LXJx0raZAlNR1QFrlz7jtWMahLestBcTHPJJM= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090611170015.GA3651@infradead.org> References: <20090611160329.GA3366@elte.hu> <20090611161714.GA5008@infradead.org> <20090611165226.GV8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1244739378.6691.540.camel@laptop> <20090611170015.GA3651@infradead.org> From: Ray Lee Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:05:02 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9941404cc10972c6 Message-ID: <2c0942db0906111005g5e9cd1c7te603bcdb8c6cc921@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Performance Counters for Linux To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , "David S. Miller" , Stephane Eranian , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 06:56:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> No, once a kernel with this syscall gets released we most certainly >> intend to maintain its ABI. > > So what point is there in keeping it in-tree except making life hell for > packagers? Packagers are quite used to taking a single source tree and building multiple packages out of it. This isn't rocket science. It's the multiple separate trees that need to be released in lock-step that are headaches.