From: Aditya <yashsri421@gmail.com>
To: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mmots] checkpatch: add fix for non-standard signature - co-authored-by
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:53:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c0c1501-4e53-85a6-94d5-2082f8e98885@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKXUXMxPMdGmnOWdYnS0VQXaAH9dTe7uNfUUPp-GLy2xTXuABw@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/12/20 4:29 pm, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:59 AM Aditya <yashsri421@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/12/20 12:26 am, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 00:00 +0530, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
>>>> Currently, checkpatch.pl warns us for BAD_SIGN_OFF on the usage of
>>>> non-standard signatures.
>>>>
>>>> An evaluation on v4.13..v5.8 showed that out of 539 warnings due to
>>>> non-standard signatures, 43 are due to the use of 'Co-authored-by'
>>>> tag, which may seem correct, but is not standard.
>>>>
>>>> The standard signature equivalent for 'Co-authored-by' is
>>>> 'Co-developed-by'.
>>>
>>> I'm not going to ack this as I don't mind non-standard signatures.
>>>
>>
>> What do you suggest?
>> Should I drop this patch and move on?
>>
>
> Joe does not ack this, but he also does not nack it.
>
> You either move on (which is perfectly fine), or
>
> you either wait that Andrew Morton reviews it and accepts it because
> he thinks it useful, or
>
> you reach out to the git committers that have been using
> Co-authored-by in the past and ask them if this kind of feature would
> have been helpful for them and you get an ack from them that convinces
> Andrew Morton to pick this.
>
> I hope this helps. If nobody thinks it is a useful feature, move on to
> work others acknowledge as useful. We have enough stuff to work on.
>
Okay. I get it now. Thanks a lot Lukas :)
--
Aditya
> Lukas
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-03 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 11:29 [PATCH v5] checkpatch: add fix and improve warning msg for Non-standard signature Aditya Srivastava
2020-12-01 17:24 ` Joe Perches
2020-12-01 18:21 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-12-01 18:39 ` Joe Perches
2020-12-02 9:08 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: add fix for non-standard signature - co-authored-by Aditya Srivastava
2020-12-02 17:16 ` Joe Perches
2020-12-02 18:30 ` [PATCH -mmots] " Aditya Srivastava
2020-12-02 18:56 ` Joe Perches
2020-12-03 9:59 ` Aditya
2020-12-03 10:59 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-12-03 12:23 ` Aditya [this message]
2020-12-03 18:57 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Greg KH
2020-12-03 19:00 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-12-03 19:25 ` Greg KH
2020-12-03 19:31 ` Joe Perches
2020-12-04 14:40 ` [PATCH v6] " Aditya Srivastava
2020-12-04 15:59 ` Joe Perches
2020-12-05 10:22 ` Aditya
2020-12-05 12:03 ` Joe Perches
2020-12-05 12:55 ` Aditya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c0c1501-4e53-85a6-94d5-2082f8e98885@gmail.com \
--to=yashsri421@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®