mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	x86@kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/acpi: take rsdp address for boot params if available
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 09:26:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c4914fc-5ddd-b7e7-ef7b-90cac582122b@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171208070505.25j6dtun555v6ofo@gmail.com>

On 08/12/17 08:05, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
> 
>> In case the rsdp address in struct boot_params is specified don't try
>> to find the table by searching, but take the address directly as set
>> by the boot loader.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/osl.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> index 3bb46cb24a99..3b25e2ad7d75 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> @@ -45,6 +45,10 @@
>>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>>  #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> +#include <asm/setup.h>
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  #include "internal.h"
>>  
>>  #define _COMPONENT		ACPI_OS_SERVICES
>> @@ -195,6 +199,10 @@ acpi_physical_address __init acpi_os_get_root_pointer(void)
>>  	if (acpi_rsdp)
>>  		return acpi_rsdp;
>>  #endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> +	if (boot_params.hdr.acpi_rsdp_addr)
>> +		return boot_params.hdr.acpi_rsdp_addr;
>> +#endif
> 
> Argh, that's typical short sighted hackery, layering violations and general 
> eyesore combined into a single patch ...
> 
> Those #ifdefs are a disgrace, plus why should generic ACPI code include platform 
> details like boot_params.hdr/acpi_rsdp_addr? It's also not very extensible to 
> non-x86 - so someone will have to redo this work for ARM64 as well in the future 
> ...
> 
> So how about doing it right:
> 
> 1)
> 
> Add a __weak acpi_arch_get_root_pointer() __weak function to drivers/acpi/osl.c:
> 
> 
> __weak acpi_physical_address acpi_arch_get_root_pointer(void)
> {
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> 2)
> 
> use it in acpi_os_get_root_pointer():
> 
> 	...
> 	pa = acpi_arch_get_root_pointer();
> 	if (pa)
> 		return pa;
> 	...
> 
> 3)
> 
> Override the default variant in x86's acpi.c via something like:
> 
> acpi_physical_address acpi_arch_get_root_pointer(void)
> {
> 	return boot_params.hdr.acpi_rsdp_addr;
> }
> 
> 4)
> 
> Add this to arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h:
> 
> extern acpi_physical_address acpi_arch_get_root_pointer(void);
> 
> 5)
> 
> Add #include <asm/acpi.h> to drivers/acpi/osl.c.
> 
> 
> That looks much cleaner, has no layering violations and is infinitely more 
> extensible, right?

Right.

Thanks for the very constructive comment.


Juergen

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-08  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-07 12:28 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: make rsdp address accessible via boot params Juergen Gross
2017-12-07 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/boot: add acpi rsdp address to setup_header Juergen Gross
2017-12-08  7:16   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-08  8:28     ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2017-12-08  8:35       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-08  8:36     ` Juergen Gross
2017-12-08  8:48       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-08  8:52         ` Juergen Gross
2017-12-07 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/acpi: take rsdp address for boot params if available Juergen Gross
2017-12-08  7:05   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-08  8:26     ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2017-12-08 11:14     ` Juergen Gross
2017-12-08 11:26       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-08 11:51         ` Juergen Gross
2017-12-07 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/xen: supply rsdp address in boot params for pvh guests Juergen Gross
2017-12-08  7:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-08  8:40     ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2c4914fc-5ddd-b7e7-ef7b-90cac582122b@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®