From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: kunit: Ensure that changed bytes are actually different
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 13:25:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c8c5fa4-b0f7-4ca5-b003-4b37cc036664@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZcaFmYGClhpj82Xo@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Hi Mark,
On 2/9/24 12:05, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 08:02:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>> During the cache sync test we verify that values we expect to have been
>> written only to the cache do not appear in the hardware. This works most
>> of the time but since we randomly generate both the original and new values
>> there is a low probability that these values may actually be the same.
>> Wrap get_random_bytes() to ensure that the values are different, it is
>> likely we will want a similar pattern for other tests in the future.
>
> Sorry, works better if you actally check stuff in. v2 coming.
I don't know how v2 looks like (I think some of the hw_buf index values are
wrong), but have a look at the diff below.
Guenter
---
diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
index 6fe259a2a73f..e73bdf01f118 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
@@ -1283,7 +1283,13 @@ static void raw_sync(struct kunit *test)
hw_buf = (u16 *)data->vals;
- get_changed_bytes(&hw_buf[6], &val[0], sizeof(val));
+ get_changed_bytes(&hw_buf[4], &val[0], sizeof(val));
+ // Let's cheat.
+ // Remember, the above code doesn't look into hw_buf[2..3],
+ // so anything might be in there, including the values from
+ // the val[] array.
+ hw_buf[2] = val[0];
+ hw_buf[3] = val[1];
/* Do a regular write and a raw write in cache only mode */
regcache_cache_only(map, true);
@@ -1331,7 +1337,7 @@ static void raw_sync(struct kunit *test)
/* The values should now appear in the "hardware" */
KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, &hw_buf[2], val, sizeof(val));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, &hw_buf[6], val, sizeof(u16));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, &hw_buf[4], val, sizeof(u16));
regmap_exit(map);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-09 20:02 Mark Brown
2024-02-09 20:05 ` Mark Brown
2024-02-09 21:25 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2024-02-09 21:46 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c8c5fa4-b0f7-4ca5-b003-4b37cc036664@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®