From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>,
Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>, Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>,
Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>,
ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ocfs2: bound-check dir entries in the inline-data re-validation scan
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:59:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cb37959-c50a-44a1-b142-26cf3375c537@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811024337.3972976-3-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
On 8/11/26 10:43 AM, Zhan Xusheng wrote:
> ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_id() re-scans the inline data area the same way
> ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_el() re-scans a directory block, and is missing the
> same two bounds:
>
> for (i = 0; i < i_size_read(inode) && i < offset; ) {
> de = (struct ocfs2_dir_entry *)(data->id_data + i);
> if (le16_to_cpu(de->rec_len) < OCFS2_DIR_REC_LEN(1))
> break;
> i += le16_to_cpu(de->rec_len);
> }
>
> ocfs2_validate_inode_block() keeps i_size inside the inline area:
>
> if (le16_to_cpu(data->id_count) >
> ocfs2_max_inline_data_with_xattr(sb, di))
> if (le64_to_cpu(di->i_size) > le16_to_cpu(data->id_count))
>
> and that area runs to the end of the inode block, so for a full inline
> directory data->id_data + i_size is the end of di_bh->b_data. A bogus
> rec_len leaves i in the last OCFS2_DIR_REC_LEN(1) - 1 bytes of it, and
> de->rec_len, at byte offset 8 within the entry, is then read past the
> block.
>
> The emit loop below hands i_size_read(inode) to ocfs2_check_dir_entry(),
> which refuses both an entry that close to the end and one whose rec_len
> runs past it. Apply the same two bounds to the re-validation scan, reading
> i_size once into a local as ocfs2_check_dir_entry() takes it as @size.
>
> Unlike the extent case there is no mask to corrupt here: an unbounded i
> only sets ctx->pos past i_size, which ends the readdir early rather
> than moving it to the wrong place.
>
> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
> Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
> Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
> Cc: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> index 39ce60874e17..863c69dec7da 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -1812,7 +1812,12 @@ static int ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_id(struct inode *inode,
> * dirent right now. Scan from the start of the block
> * to make sure. */
> if (!inode_eq_iversion(inode, *f_version)) {
> - for (i = 0; i < i_size_read(inode) && i < offset; ) {
> + loff_t size = i_size_read(inode);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i + OCFS2_DIR_REC_LEN(1) <= size &&
> + i < offset;) {
> + unsigned int rec_len;
> +
> de = (struct ocfs2_dir_entry *)
> (data->id_data + i);
> /* It's too expensive to do a full
> @@ -1821,10 +1826,11 @@ static int ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_id(struct inode *inode,
> * least that it is non-zero. A
> * failure will be detected in the
> * dirent test below. */
> - if (le16_to_cpu(de->rec_len) <
> - OCFS2_DIR_REC_LEN(1))
> + rec_len = le16_to_cpu(de->rec_len);
> + if (rec_len < OCFS2_DIR_REC_LEN(1) ||
> + i + rec_len > size)
> break;
> - i += le16_to_cpu(de->rec_len);
> + i += rec_len;
> }
> ctx->pos = offset = i;
> *f_version = inode_query_iversion(inode);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-11 2:43 [PATCH v2 0/2] ocfs2: bound-check both readdir re-validation scans Zhan Xusheng
2026-08-11 2:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ocfs2: bound-check dir entries in the readdir re-validation scan Zhan Xusheng
2026-08-11 6:59 ` Joseph Qi
2026-08-12 2:22 ` Andrew Morton
2026-08-12 2:37 ` Zhan Xusheng
2026-08-11 2:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ocfs2: bound-check dir entries in the inline-data " Zhan Xusheng
2026-08-11 6:59 ` Joseph Qi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2cb37959-c50a-44a1-b142-26cf3375c537@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gechangwei@live.cn \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=piaojun@huawei.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®