mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Balazs Nemeth <bnemeth@redhat.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: check if protocol extracted by virtio_net_hdr_set_proto is correct
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:51:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cc06597-8005-7be8-4094-b20f525afde8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTSe7srSBnAmFNFBFkDrLmPL5XtxhbXEs1mBytUBuuym2fg@mail.gmail.com>


On 2021/2/18 11:50 下午, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:01 AM Balazs Nemeth <bnemeth@redhat.com> wrote:
>> For gso packets, virtio_net_hdr_set_proto sets the protocol (if it isn't
>> set) based on the type in the virtio net hdr, but the skb could contain
>> anything since it could come from packet_snd through a raw socket. If
>> there is a mismatch between what virtio_net_hdr_set_proto sets and
>> the actual protocol, then the skb could be handled incorrectly later
>> on by gso.
>>
>> The network header of gso packets starts at 14 bytes, but a specially
>> crafted packet could fool the call to skb_flow_dissect_flow_keys_basic
>> as the network header offset in the skb could be incorrect.
>> Consequently, EINVAL is not returned.
>>
>> There are even packets that can cause an infinite loop. For example, a
>> packet with ethernet type ETH_P_MPLS_UC (which is unnoticed by
>> virtio_net_hdr_to_skb) that is sent to a geneve interface will be
>> handled by geneve_build_skb. In turn, it calls
>> udp_tunnel_handle_offloads which then calls skb_reset_inner_headers.
>> After that, the packet gets passed to mpls_gso_segment. That function
>> calculates the mpls header length by taking the difference between
>> network_header and inner_network_header. Since the two are equal
>> (due to the earlier call to skb_reset_inner_headers), it will calculate
>> a header of length 0, and it will not pull any headers. Then, it will
>> call skb_mac_gso_segment which will again call mpls_gso_segment, etc...
>> This leads to the infinite loop.


I remember kernel will validate dodgy gso packets in gso ops. I wonder 
why not do the check there? The reason is that virtio/TUN is not the 
only source for those packets.

Thanks


>>
>> For that reason, address the root cause of the issue: don't blindly
>> trust the information provided by the virtio net header. Instead,
>> check if the protocol in the packet actually matches the protocol set by
>> virtio_net_hdr_set_proto.
>>
>> Fixes: 9274124f023b ("net: stricter validation of untrusted gso packets")
>> Signed-off-by: Balazs Nemeth <bnemeth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/virtio_net.h | 7 ++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
>> index e8a924eeea3d..cf2c53563f22 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/virtio_net.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
>> @@ -79,8 +79,13 @@ static inline int virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>                  if (gso_type && skb->network_header) {
>>                          struct flow_keys_basic keys;
>>
>> -                       if (!skb->protocol)
>> +                       if (!skb->protocol) {
>> +                               const struct ethhdr *eth = skb_eth_hdr(skb);
>> +
> Unfortunately, cannot assume that the device type is ARPHRD_ETHER.
>
> The underlying approach is sound: packets that have a gso type set in
> the virtio_net_hdr have to be IP packets.
>
>>                                  virtio_net_hdr_set_proto(skb, hdr);
>> +                               if (skb->protocol != eth->h_proto)
>> +                                       return -EINVAL;
>> +                       }
>>   retry:
>>                          if (!skb_flow_dissect_flow_keys_basic(NULL, skb, &keys,
>>                                                                NULL, 0, 0, 0,
>> --
>> 2.29.2
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-19  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-18 14:57 Balazs Nemeth
2021-02-18 15:50 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-02-19  8:51   ` Jason Wang [this message]
2021-02-19 14:55     ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-02-22  3:39       ` Jason Wang
2021-02-23 13:42         ` Balazs Nemeth
2021-02-23 14:22           ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2cc06597-8005-7be8-4094-b20f525afde8@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=bnemeth@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®