From: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"David Jander" <david@protonic.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] iio: dac: ds4424: convert to regmap
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 15:42:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cfd142fbaad3ddd3b3fb632c77a4e9f58d50f66.camel@svanheule.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260127060939.3914006-6-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Hi Oleksij,
On Tue, 2026-01-27 at 07:09 +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Refactor the driver to use the regmap API.
>
> Replace the driver-specific mutex and manual shadow buffers with the
> standard regmap infrastructure for locking and caching.
>
> This ensures the cache is populated from hardware at probe, preventing
> state desynchronization (e.g. across suspend/resume).
[...]
> +static const struct regmap_access_table ds44x4_table = {
> + .yes_ranges = ds44x4_ranges,
> + .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(ds44x4_ranges),
> +};
>
> -static int ds4424_set_value(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> - int val, struct iio_chan_spec const *chan)
> +static const struct regmap_config ds44x2_regmap_config = {
> + .reg_bits = 8,
> + .val_bits = 8,
> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_FLAT,
> + .max_register = DS4424_DAC_ADDR(1),
> + .rd_table = &ds44x2_table,
> + .wr_table = &ds44x2_table,
> +};
Note that REGCACHE_FLAT will allocate 0xF8 unsigned longs you will never use.
REGCACHE_MAPLE will probably be much closer to the size of the original value
cache, for a small look-up performance penalty (but always fast compared to the
I2C bus).
[...]
> @@ -163,49 +184,52 @@ static int ds4424_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>
> static int ds4424_verify_chip(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> - int ret, val;
> + struct ds4424_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + u8 raw_values[DS4424_MAX_DAC_CHANNELS];
> + int ret;
>
> - ret = ds4424_get_value(indio_dev, &val, 0);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - dev_err(&indio_dev->dev,
> - "%s failed. ret: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> + /* Bulk read all channels starting at 0xf8.
> + * This populates the regmap cache with current HW values.
> + */
> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(data->regmap, DS4424_DAC_ADDR(0),
> + raw_values, indio_dev->num_channels);
Are you forcing a HW-to-cache sync for performance?
Previously this function would just read a single value to verify a reply was
sent, instead of seeding the cache in data->raw, so that's a change in behavior
(and purpose) of this function, meaning you may want to change the name if you
keep this.
You could (should IMHO) use a sparse cache, which is actually aware of its
content's validity and will transparently access the device on the first access
to initialize itself. I would recommend REGCACHE_MAPLE as above, but
REGCACHE_FLAT_S also works. REGCACHE_FLAT is tricky to properly initialize [1],
and I would not recommend using it in new code.
Using a single regmap_read() here (as ds4424_get_value() before) with a sparse
cache would result in an error if there was a bus error, giving you the
verification behavior again.
[1] https://patch.msgid.link/20251023135032.229511-1-sander@svanheule.net/
Best,
Sander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-01 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-27 6:09 [PATCH v2 0/8] iio: dac: ds4424: add DS4402/DS4404 support and scale Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-27 6:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: iio: dac: maxim,ds4424: add ds4402/ds4404 Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-27 6:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: iio: dac: maxim,ds4424: add maxim,rfs-ohms property Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-27 19:49 ` Conor Dooley
2026-01-27 19:55 ` Conor Dooley
2026-01-28 8:01 ` David Jander
2026-01-28 17:00 ` Conor Dooley
2026-01-27 6:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] iio: dac: ds4424: add DS4402/DS4404 device IDs Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-27 10:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-27 6:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] iio: dac: ds4424: sort headers alphabetically Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-27 10:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-27 6:09 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] iio: dac: ds4424: convert to regmap Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-27 10:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-01 14:42 ` Sander Vanheule [this message]
2026-02-01 16:16 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-02-01 17:24 ` Sander Vanheule
2026-02-03 10:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-03 10:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-27 6:09 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] iio: dac: ds4424: fix -128 rejection and refactor raw access Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-27 10:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-27 10:49 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-27 10:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-27 6:09 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] iio: dac: ds4424: add Rfs-based scale and per-variant limits Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-27 10:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-27 6:09 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] iio: dac: ds4424: ratelimit read errors and use device context Oleksij Rempel
2026-01-27 10:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2cfd142fbaad3ddd3b3fb632c77a4e9f58d50f66.camel@svanheule.net \
--to=sander@svanheule.net \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david@protonic.nl \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®