mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <joro@8bytes.org>, <jpb@kernel.org>, <praan@google.com>,
	<miko.lenczewski@arm.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v1 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use dummy ASID/VMID in arm_smmu_master_build_invs()
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:26:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cfda3d1f80ca3548a77d5da9261112e3f00a404.1766088962.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1766088962.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>

The arm_smmu_inv_cmp() function no longer enforces ASID/VMID values on an
iotlb tag entry, to allow sharing an existing tag in the domain->invs. If
no tag is found on the same SMMU, a new tag will be allocated.

Therefore, there is no point in passing in any id to the iotlb entries in
the master->build_invs array. Use a dummy ID=0 that is out of range of an
ID allocation, so as to set free cd->asid and s2_cfg->vmid. An ATS entry
must still have a specific ID.

Since CD/STE has the ASID/VMID coming from the master structure, lift the
cur->id check in arm_smmu_invs_merge(), to use the new ID allocation path.

Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 29 ++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index d6ae630d0de3..d51bad1002ff 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -1148,17 +1148,6 @@ struct arm_smmu_invs *arm_smmu_invs_merge(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
 		if (cmp < 0 && i < invs->num_invs)
 			continue;
 
-		/*
-		 * Currently the @to_merge array always carries an id (> 0) that
-		 * is also installed in the CD/STE. So, we cannot allocate a new
-		 * ID at this moment, because that would misalign with what's in
-		 * the CD/STE. To not break the existing flow, bypass the new ID
-		 * allocating code. We will lift this bypass line once rework is
-		 * done.
-		 */
-		if (cur->id)
-			continue;
-
 		/* No found. Allocate a new one */
 		if (j == 0) {
 			/* KUNIT test doesn't pass in an alloc_id function */
@@ -3331,11 +3320,16 @@ arm_smmu_master_build_invs(struct arm_smmu_master *master, bool ats_enabled,
 	if (master->smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_RANGE_INV)
 		pgsize = __ffs(smmu_domain->domain.pgsize_bitmap);
 
+	/*
+	 * Each SMMU has only one iotlb tag in the array, so leave the iotlb tag
+	 * ID to be 0. The merge() and unref() will find the existing one in the
+	 * array to refcount_inc/dec. In case of missing a match, merge() should
+	 * allocate a new ID while unref() should WARN_ON.
+	 */
 	switch (smmu_domain->stage) {
 	case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_SVA:
 	case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1:
-		if (!arm_smmu_master_build_inv(master, INV_TYPE_S1_ASID,
-					       smmu_domain->cd.asid,
+		if (!arm_smmu_master_build_inv(master, INV_TYPE_S1_ASID, 0,
 					       IOMMU_NO_PASID, pgsize))
 			return NULL;
 		master->build_invs->alloc_id = arm_smmu_inv_alloc_asid;
@@ -3343,8 +3337,7 @@ arm_smmu_master_build_invs(struct arm_smmu_master *master, bool ats_enabled,
 		master->build_invs->smmu_domain = smmu_domain;
 		break;
 	case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S2:
-		if (!arm_smmu_master_build_inv(master, INV_TYPE_S2_VMID,
-					       smmu_domain->s2_cfg.vmid,
+		if (!arm_smmu_master_build_inv(master, INV_TYPE_S2_VMID, 0,
 					       IOMMU_NO_PASID, pgsize))
 			return NULL;
 		master->build_invs->alloc_id = arm_smmu_inv_alloc_vmid;
@@ -3357,9 +3350,9 @@ arm_smmu_master_build_invs(struct arm_smmu_master *master, bool ats_enabled,
 
 	/* All the nested S1 ASIDs have to be flushed when S2 parent changes */
 	if (nesting) {
-		if (!arm_smmu_master_build_inv(
-			    master, INV_TYPE_S2_VMID_S1_CLEAR,
-			    smmu_domain->s2_cfg.vmid, IOMMU_NO_PASID, 0))
+		if (!arm_smmu_master_build_inv(master,
+					       INV_TYPE_S2_VMID_S1_CLEAR, 0,
+					       IOMMU_NO_PASID, 0))
 			return NULL;
 	}
 
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-18 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-18 20:26 [PATCH v1 0/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Share domain across SMMU/vSMMU instances Nicolin Chen
2025-12-18 20:26 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass in ssid to arm_smmu_make_s1_cd() Nicolin Chen
2025-12-18 20:26 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add alloc_id/free_id functions to arm_smmu_invs Nicolin Chen
2025-12-19 17:05   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-19 20:56     ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-02 15:54       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-30 18:52     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-31 19:48       ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-02 15:57       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-16  5:13         ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-16 14:41           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-16 16:58             ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-16 17:11               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-16 18:27                 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-17  1:11                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-18 20:26 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Store ASIDs and VMID in arm_smmu_master Nicolin Chen
2025-12-19 15:16   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-19 19:17     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-18 20:26 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use alloc_id/free_id ops in arm_smmu_invs_merge/unref Nicolin Chen
2025-12-18 20:26 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Install to CD/STE the ASID/VMID stored in the master Nicolin Chen
2025-12-18 20:26 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-12-18 20:26 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove free_fn argument from arm_smmu_invs_unref() Nicolin Chen
2025-12-18 20:26 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove ASID/VMID from arm_smmu_domain Nicolin Chen
2025-12-18 20:26 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allow sharing domain across SMMUs Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2cfda3d1f80ca3548a77d5da9261112e3f00a404.1766088962.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jpb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=praan@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome