From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC6E9408004 for ; Tue, 19 May 2026 15:26:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779204399; cv=none; b=P5TBQYBx3V0LKmQQrKXDg/M22XnSyTXIeyplaFGC2ie5gjjgct1vDQ1yjyia29KHOFNlEiskrvAOuvOHbUk8eGYTXyRDTZJ+431hPsUMho8/9B76tKfK9aE40tfesaMLIXVVCwPM2axwUv13ddNS9oFSd/Zl1jKGd9F3s3h+uoU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779204399; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RhHhLz0ktvn4Y5cTid2w3gxzIwhfEm+oxBirNRiAeNI=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=OkAnMoz14xW6LMpm4dUAcP1JHqKd2WJ8hENmd3LqxPll5M1c3GzXRJA7McDtblmVhkXzdg6OMZ/kWw7vgdyqUEdykJ1rtqZr8qU363bgIN1WW1mZ8Sq79Ictt13Y9fuZ5rUOUK3OrKUc35quYLg+/jdqpXnB2F0MfqVirqjrLpU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=hZMzBu+l; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=T6PYfGGG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="hZMzBu+l"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="T6PYfGGG" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1779204396; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=RhHhLz0ktvn4Y5cTid2w3gxzIwhfEm+oxBirNRiAeNI=; b=hZMzBu+lk4xS5GLmn8H0OVW88bPUGOsl/qU9/cnuaW6Jlqb51Q2aDDQAk8mAlUUUctm3vY FosNvSjtwp0/zxh6aLXWv47ErHF5YeAHz+Pte//3LAmjF5gh8dgNruOBA1cOJDk1BmyZrv vMRnmy6g9POK0tGQ3Z6eiyO3u9QKyV8= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-440-iMuslPdENxSrvua50Uf1UA-1; Tue, 19 May 2026 11:26:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: iMuslPdENxSrvua50Uf1UA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: iMuslPdENxSrvua50Uf1UA_1779204394 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4497a0e3acaso3788199f8f.0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2026 08:26:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1779204394; x=1779809194; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:autocrypt :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RhHhLz0ktvn4Y5cTid2w3gxzIwhfEm+oxBirNRiAeNI=; b=T6PYfGGGxR+AgvYeCZIGNHhZwfWCLbK3ccWYqvk9eftJWgIQby/jVVbwEX/Xgz/aI0 TSP1efwEYRi6r3W5Mlri8vW6+SrL1DJzFguSFHz4qOkrYw3yLpCIsZWXkB7kss4mN1H6 sqx2+Neq8xT9Z1s4hsMz7ECMX5q9wKEzUgUXtqFAHh/8PIg9RhAi7t234Hz4ivGm6UKy IgkdHykc3BQWIfmFakI+nbXqqInjPE1LGCCPyxjbnEjLTnmBig1baZZeI0TmO9sCPHC7 vnbF7hZRxp0j/wh5noQB8JYs5uf17WDIxF5IA+yLW2QeHVnTd0fIaOT5Axv4pQAuxWpU 26Vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1779204394; x=1779809194; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:autocrypt :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RhHhLz0ktvn4Y5cTid2w3gxzIwhfEm+oxBirNRiAeNI=; b=X18pupJtRl/Zh/m7cRxh6XhTTpaUZv7Rtz4c0Q87DV5+ha71qIpRa5JsL7sT6tkrMt /DNILPG+GqWuYSg6FL8sNMDKR5AD9j7rNRBigCaRAPv1c0XNv/KF6HAqe+uLrVq+PEvw cRTIXn1qehR9AtefcgsUD0hAWXTA6F/sorhux7qmjnMGtQ2GHReNqPkD3Q5nZfdx9FSQ DdvCTexCxHr0wNDyVjm/oJGhrBIUBHwIw1gE2m8zFiiw2gzC48CqPn5RZZc4DRFjvn1z at+gNX9jlgU0mjLUP2HjnScL1Ohv0s129Xr/lZlSYoWC54v6BBIRdsr6VqWdSnfNsgPw oIGw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9hYVGcEbOzhyRhJltnoh00Bz4SVSlCRxS7xKxk9TXjjRJ3YmOTbtKkNfzEIotUJW9E/xPag4nukqVV+zE=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyz0hXmCfX6eJCKAvkp5YHq92ELeA1snMJU1p9UnuMLR3OBhMVh 7E41y46ZS1GjPqO5kEiZN+y3yiFW3+sKaTtM9w3thxDYW77+hd+J7+gK5AD0hcyEp6KwBSt7VuG Z5S6QNxouwakslZjzeLvhHdT6xX6fFsZaNSATACHYvgmFVhqI0bGkiu2kvW8MkmCmnQ== X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OHFdDK5ZBjc7tR4UUz6O9HzsAzbU7UM/9YpXCwdZoF7Ot1avq4D9vFps5P1JeJ NliuR79/E+W/1PtVJzc40Jhj+F4D6woGyoUYWVIHVt3RqRvhijmORTQOVzBvN46Lf7nVkD7W4Mg SEjR3cYV/FEJBFOy4L9ilomrkuk9fdvqmb/EABqLVcLAbDjxZriTTub/nborm5HAqaK1WxaA3xx oaQv4Ehn+794PlSyS0HsSRGdhyHvHTmSbPCfK2/NCRbRQIgUoEaL/PPNmQmkrFlJ6COdFQJCR1q aZHi2aBhbpHR0ygtqGJvAv1qYoexs3ZtK15fiyBWmGPnAzVH1h2+EztLw2WZKCwdRTg5YOl95GA fqAf0dJZ7BYCNtDSUKHywMKeBEAAoMJuZGoSdBccBZtEuEJs46KI6V7+HPfodOfI2ekHwTQR6Ua jc/D14RDIGd28KYs8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600d:10:b0:48a:568f:ae6d with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48fe60e7d79mr253400275e9.8.1779204394103; Tue, 19 May 2026 08:26:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600d:10:b0:48a:568f:ae6d with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48fe60e7d79mr253400035e9.8.1779204393723; Tue, 19 May 2026 08:26:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmonaco-thinkpadt14gen3.rmtit.csb (212-8-243-115.hosted-by-worldstream.net. [212.8.243.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-48ff2cb4ae0sm159772365e9.0.2026.05.19.08.26.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 May 2026 08:26:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d19140a92df11d28f9b74e4a370f55940e042f1.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] rv/rtapp/sleep: Make the error more informative for user From: Gabriele Monaco To: Nam Cao Cc: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 17:26:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y0hf2zj9.fsf@yellow.woof> References: <14242f444f7d2396c0c5a345f0099665d09a0ec5.1779176466.git.namcao@linutronix.de> <19cffa1267c6538e6310b0149b0367807af76ac0.camel@redhat.com> <87y0hf2zj9.fsf@yellow.woof> Autocrypt: addr=gmonaco@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=mDMEZuK5YxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAmJ3dM9Sz6/Hodu33Qrf8QH2bNeNbOikqYtxWFLVm0 1a0JEdhYnJpZWxlIE1vbmFjbyA8Z21vbmFjb0BrZXJuZWwub3JnPoiZBBMWCgBBFiEEysoR+AuB3R Zwp6j270psSVh4TfIFAmjKX2MCGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwICIgIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgcCF4AACgk Q70psSVh4TfIQuAD+JulczTN6l7oJjyroySU55Fbjdvo52xiYYlMjPG7dCTsBAMFI7dSL5zg98I+8 cXY1J7kyNsY6/dcipqBM4RMaxXsOtCRHYWJyaWVsZSBNb25hY28gPGdtb25hY29AcmVkaGF0LmNvb T6InAQTFgoARAIbAwUJBaOagAULCQgHAgIiAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeBwIXgBYhBMrKEfgLgd0WcK eo9u9KbElYeE3yBQJoymCyAhkBAAoJEO9KbElYeE3yjX4BAJ/ETNnlHn8OjZPT77xGmal9kbT1bC1 7DfrYVISWV2Y1AP9HdAMhWNAvtCtN2S1beYjNybuK6IzWYcFfeOV+OBWRDQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.60.1 (3.60.1-1.fc44) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Tue, 2026-05-19 at 17:24 +0200, Nam Cao wrote: > Gabriele Monaco writes: > > On Tue, 2026-05-19 at 09:49 +0200, Nam Cao wrote: > > > The rtapp/sleep monitor detects real-time tasks which go to sleep in = an > > > real-time-unsafe manner. If this happen, the monitor triggers a trace > > > event > > > in the sched_wakeup tracepoint's handler. > >=20 > > Ok so here WAKE is no longer tied to the wakeup event but to the end of= the > > task > > switch. > >=20 > > So what happens if a task was not sleeping but just got preempted? Woul= dn't > > that > > trigger WAKE (though that isn't a real wakeup) without RT_FRIENDLY_WAKE= ? >=20 > The monitor's rule says that when a task sleeps, it will not wake > without rt-friendly wake. If it "wakes" without initial sleep, it is > simply ignored. Right makes sense. > I can change the name to be SCHEDULE_IN or something like that to make > it clearer. >=20 Yeah that'd be clearer, or at least a comment stating this somewhere. Thanks, Gabriele