On Fri, 13 Nov 2026, Neko wrote: > 在 2026/11/6 22:33, Yun Wang 写道: > > The Redmi G 2022 (board TM2135, BIOS RMGAD6T0P1313) implements only > > three modes: 0x02 for quiet, 0x01 for balanced and 0x03 for performance. > > The default profile table maps balanced to 0x00, but this firmware > > recognizes it as the performance mode. Because the firmware does not > > implement the AC adapter type query, setting balanced-performance or > > performance fails with -ENODATA. > > > > Add a DMI entry with a three-entry profile table for this model and > > enable skip_ac_type_check. 0x04 is not used for performance: writing it > > succeeds and the value reads back as 0x04, but in three test runs on > > 7.2.11 the firmware did not emit WMI event 0x16, which it emits after > > every other mode change. The Fn+K hotkey also cycles only through the > > three modes above. > > > > Tested on this machine with this patch and the series it depends on, > > built as an out-of-tree module and loaded on a 7.2.14 kernel. Writing > > low-power, balanced, and performance succeeds, the profile reads back > > correctly, and the firmware emits one 0x16 event for each (values 2, 1, > > and 3). Writing balanced-performance is rejected, and Fn+K cycles > > through low-power, balanced, and performance. > > > > Claude Code (claude-opus-5-5) analyzed the ACPI tables, wrote the test > > scripts, specified the change and corrected this changelog. I wrote the > > code and the changelog and ran the tests on this machine. > > > > Link: > > https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/OT2JfRLDi6yHShYvywRZoFBYdW-TUgdKqKtahRM5b0cZxNo6eGZHnO5dKf4oYFaEtZhEsqU-Q-2OFe0D-qToJMVUrS5_d2aa2Q5LD50ISIc=@proton.me/ > > Link: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/BelDdF5woNEBX6dZ3_zJDEbVkifs1pdxEjtQ1yC-aKyZahijFJCllxm0l_SqZ5Hsj61D8wfJNa7uDSuNKmyyxo2S0tZp9QS5yaafeZUxvxE=@proton.me/ > > Suggested-by: Mingyou Chen > > Signed-off-by: Yun Wang <7z0423arsenova@proton.me> > > I have tested this patch on my Redmi G 2022 (board model TM2135) and have > confirmed that I can now switch between "performance", "balanced", and > "power-saver" power profiles via the KDE power manager tray. > > Stress testing with s-tui also shows different power draw under different > profiles. > > Tested-by: Yu Pan Thanks all. I've applied this patch now to the review-ilpo-next branch resolving the conflict. -- i.