From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752220Ab0CYRQQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:16:16 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f222.google.com ([209.85.219.222]:33474 "EHLO mail-ew0-f222.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750851Ab0CYRQP (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:16:15 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 304 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:16:14 EDT DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=YEKG3dSn67x0nSRgdGD8GC/l+MwG+d/IjYL+Vogs0E+02U50/t3rO+p0kuoqKCbs3T bAcgyvCJA3paeOn49daPVhA/JE/HGJSZHN009YVIQApUgbd5XuZh8oXUQWxVcYa9HTeF A71C/NvJ8TiEuLvDbNRkzDWr/ap+Fe/ehj/9A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:11:09 +0100 Message-ID: <2d460de71003251011y2d8d1931u683b396f40df4ed1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Question about e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 -- [IPV4]: The scheduled removal of multipath cached routing support. From: Richard Hartmann To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@sunset.davemloft.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I was wondering what the rationale for commit e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 is. We upgraded our custom image to 2.6.33 recently and found those options to be missing. Thanks, Richard Hartmann