From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Zefan Li" <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"Rob Clark" <robdclark@chromium.org>,
"Stéphane Marchesin" <marcheu@chromium.org>,
"T . J . Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>,
Kenny.Ho@amd.com, "Brian Welty" <brian.welty@intel.com>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
"Zack Rusin" <zackr@vmware.com>,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/10] drm: Track clients by tgid and not tid
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:33:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d4c10c7-6406-7458-4f52-4260b415874e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230314141904.1210824-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Am 14.03.23 um 15:18 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> Thread group id (aka pid from userspace point of view) is a more
> interesting thing to show as an owner of a DRM fd, so track and show that
> instead of the thread id.
>
> In the next patch we will make the owner updated post file descriptor
> handover, which will also be tgid based to avoid ping-pong when multiple
> threads access the fd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>
> Cc: linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Should we push the already reviewed cleanups like this one to
drm-misc-next? That makes sense even without the rest of the
functionality and reduce the amount of patches re-send.
Christian.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gem.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
> index d8e683688daa..863cb668e000 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
> @@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_gem_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> * Therefore, we need to protect this ->comm access using RCU.
> */
> rcu_read_lock();
> - task = pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> + task = pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
> seq_printf(m, "pid %8d command %s:\n", pid_nr(file->pid),
> task ? task->comm : "<unknown>");
> rcu_read_unlock();
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c
> index 4f643a490dc3..4855230ba2c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int drm_clients_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> seq_printf(m,
> "%20s %5s %3s master a %5s %10s\n",
> "command",
> - "pid",
> + "tgid",
> "dev",
> "uid",
> "magic");
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int drm_clients_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> bool is_current_master = drm_is_current_master(priv);
>
> rcu_read_lock(); /* locks pid_task()->comm */
> - task = pid_task(priv->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> + task = pid_task(priv->pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
> uid = task ? __task_cred(task)->euid : GLOBAL_ROOT_UID;
> seq_printf(m, "%20s %5d %3d %c %c %5d %10u\n",
> task ? task->comm : "<unknown>",
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
> index a51ff8cee049..c1018c470047 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ struct drm_file *drm_file_alloc(struct drm_minor *minor)
> if (!file)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - file->pid = get_pid(task_pid(current));
> + file->pid = get_pid(task_tgid(current));
> file->minor = minor;
>
> /* for compatibility root is always authenticated */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gem.c
> index d6baf73a6458..c0da89e16e6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gem.c
> @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static int vmw_debugfs_gem_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> * Therefore, we need to protect this ->comm access using RCU.
> */
> rcu_read_lock();
> - task = pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> + task = pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
> seq_printf(m, "pid %8d command %s:\n", pid_nr(file->pid),
> task ? task->comm : "<unknown>");
> rcu_read_unlock();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-14 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-14 14:18 [RFC v4 00/10] DRM scheduling cgroup controller Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-03-14 14:18 ` [RFC 01/10] drm: Track clients by tgid and not tid Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-03-14 15:33 ` Christian König [this message]
2023-03-15 9:52 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-03-15 13:19 ` Christian König
2023-03-14 14:18 ` [RFC 02/10] drm: Update file owner during use Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-03-14 15:49 ` Christian König
2023-04-21 12:13 ` Emil Velikov
2023-06-08 14:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-06-20 14:48 ` Emil Velikov
2023-03-14 14:18 ` [RFC 03/10] cgroup: Add the DRM cgroup controller Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-03-14 14:18 ` [RFC 04/10] drm/cgroup: Track DRM clients per cgroup Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-03-14 14:18 ` [RFC 05/10] drm/cgroup: Add ability to query drm cgroup GPU time Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-03-14 14:19 ` [RFC 06/10] drm/cgroup: Add over budget signalling callback Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-03-14 14:19 ` [RFC 07/10] drm/cgroup: Only track clients which are providing drm_cgroup_ops Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-03-14 14:19 ` [RFC 08/10] cgroup/drm: Introduce weight based drm cgroup control Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-03-14 14:19 ` [RFC 09/10] drm/i915: Wire up with drm controller GPU time query Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-03-14 14:19 ` [RFC 10/10] drm/i915: Implement cgroup controller over budget throttling Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-03-25 1:43 ` [RFC v4 00/10] DRM scheduling cgroup controller Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2d4c10c7-6406-7458-4f52-4260b415874e@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=Kenny.Ho@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=brian.welty@intel.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=marcheu@chromium.org \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zackr@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®