From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752554Ab1HMVbB (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Aug 2011 17:31:01 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:40465 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752482Ab1HMVbA (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Aug 2011 17:31:00 -0400 References: <20110729180028.6a2091b3.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20110730235644.GA29671@suse.de> <4E359A74.7090408@zytor.com> <20110813123401.76ffcfcc.rdunlap@xenotime.net> User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20110813123401.76ffcfcc.rdunlap@xenotime.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add Internal-reference-ID: patch tag From: "H. Peter Anvin" Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 17:29:52 -0400 To: Randy Dunlap CC: Mike Waychison , Greg KH , lkml , Andrew Morton , Theodore Tso , Alan Cox Message-ID: <2d50505d-3500-47d8-84d4-b32850bdec7e@email.android.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Randy Dunlap wrote: >On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 11:09:56 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> On 07/31/2011 11:07 AM, Mike Waychison wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Internal-reference-ID: rdunlap.2011.0729.id1 >> >>> >> > >> > Acked-by: Mike Waychison >> > >> >> Just to avoid namespace collisions, can we at least put the owner >> somewhere standardized, e.g. <2011.0729.id1@rdunlap>, <33999@google> >and >> so on? > >I would prefer to leave the text contents as unspecified, but I >wouldn't >mind recommending that users try to make them unique, e.g., by using >a company-ID or owner-ID. Would that be acceptable? > > >--- >~Randy >*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your >code *** No, that wouldn't work when there is more than one tag from different users. And yes, I fully expect to see that. -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse my brevity and lack of formatting.