From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] x86/msr: Switch rdmsr_safe_on_cpu() users to rdmsrq_safe_on_cpu()
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2026 08:31:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2db3e888-a675-474a-9d1a-bb9d9bb162bd@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aiPtnrkdHDHc0Iqz@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2022 bytes --]
On 06.06.26 11:51, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>
>> In order to prepare retiring rdmsr_safe_on_cpu() switch
>> rdmsr_safe_on_cpu() users to rdmsrq_safe_on_cpu().
>
>> --- a/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
>> @@ -190,11 +190,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsrq_safe_on_cpu);
>>
>> int rdmsrq_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u64 *q)
>> {
>> - u32 low, high;
>> + struct msr_info_completion rv;
>> + call_single_data_t csd;
>> int err;
>>
>> - err = rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(cpu, msr_no, &low, &high);
>> - *q = (u64)high << 32 | low;
>> + INIT_CSD(&csd, __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv);
>> +
>> + memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
>> + init_completion(&rv.done);
>> + rv.msr.msr_no = msr_no;
>> +
>> + err = smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &csd);
>> + if (!err) {
>> + wait_for_completion(&rv.done);
>> + err = rv.msr.err;
>> + }
>> + *q = rv.msr.reg.q;
>
> While technically this is another API user conversion,
> I'd split this out into another preparatory patch,
> because this changes the API itself.
Okay, fine with me.
I'll send V3 after rc1 of 7.2 as Dave suggested.
One final question (not directly for this series, but for a future one):
I'd like to switch rdmsrq() from a macro to an inline function, as a macro
using one of its parameters as the destination for an assignment isn't
nice. Additionally I'd like to replace rdmsr*() use cases with rdmsrq*()
and wrmsr*() with wrmsrq*() (similar to the replacements done is this
series).
The rdmsrq() transformation into a function can easily be done via a
coccinelle script. What would be your choice regarding the sequence doing
this?
a) Start with rdmsrq() transformation into a function.
b) First do the rdmsr/wrmsr -> rdmsrq/wrmsrq replacements, then do the
rdmsrq() transformation into a function (this will touch more code, as
the initial rdmsr() use cases will be affected, too).
c) Leave rdmsrq() as a macro.
Juergen
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-07 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 14:43 [PATCH v2 00/10] x86/msr: Drop 32-bit variants of *_on_cpu() MSR functions Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] x86/msr: Switch rdmsrl_on_cpu() users to rdmsrq_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] x86/msr: Remove rdmsrl_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] x86/msr: Switch rdmsr_on_cpu() users to rdmsrq_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] x86/msr: Remove rdmsr_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/msr: Switch wrmsr_on_cpu() users to wrmsrq_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/msr: Remove wrmsr_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] x86/msr: Switch rdmsr_safe_on_cpu() users to rdmsrq_safe_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 15:04 ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-06 9:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-07 6:31 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
2026-06-07 6:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-07 6:48 ` Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] x86/msr: Remove rdmsr_safe_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 15:05 ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-05 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] x86/msr: Switch wrmsr_safe_on_cpu() users to wrmsrq_safe_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] x86/msr: Remove wrmsr_safe_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] x86/msr: Drop 32-bit variants of *_on_cpu() MSR functions Dave Hansen
2026-06-05 15:09 ` Jürgen Groß
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2db3e888-a675-474a-9d1a-bb9d9bb162bd@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®