From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9B6C4361A for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3662251D for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729845AbgLDKW7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2020 05:22:59 -0500 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:2518 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729763AbgLDKW7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2020 05:22:59 -0500 Received: from DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CnTJv5JjDzQndf; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 18:21:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggemi753-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.139) by DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 18:20:30 +0800 Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) by dggemi753-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 18:20:29 +0800 Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com ([169.254.81.184]) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com ([169.254.81.184]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:20:27 +0000 From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi To: Jean-Philippe Brucker CC: Auger Eric , wangxingang , Xieyingtai , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "maz@kernel.org" , "joro@8bytes.org" , "will@kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "vivek.gautam@arm.com" , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , "zhangfei.gao@linaro.org" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "eric.auger.pro@gmail.com" , "Zengtao (B)" , qubingbing Subject: RE: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with unmanaged ASIDs Thread-Topic: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with unmanaged ASIDs Thread-Index: AQHWvZ36CODK3kmCyk2T9hmchYhCqqniWTe/gANqCPCAAQgyAIAABi8Q Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:20:26 +0000 Message-ID: <2de03a797517452cbfeab022e12612b7@huawei.com> References: <20201118112151.25412-8-eric.auger@redhat.com> <1606829590-25924-1-git-send-email-wangxingang5@huawei.com> <2e69adf5-8207-64f7-fa8e-9f2bd3a3c4e3@redhat.com> <20201204095338.GA1912466@myrica> In-Reply-To: <20201204095338.GA1912466@myrica> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.200.67.145] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jean, > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@linaro.org] > Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54 > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > Cc: Auger Eric ; wangxingang > ; Xieyingtai ; > kvm@vger.kernel.org; maz@kernel.org; joro@8bytes.org; will@kernel.org; > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > vivek.gautam@arm.com; alex.williamson@redhat.com; > zhangfei.gao@linaro.org; robin.murphy@arm.com; > kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; eric.auger.pro@gmail.com; Zengtao (B) > ; qubingbing > Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with > unmanaged ASIDs > > Hi Shameer, > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > > Hi Jean/zhangfei, > > Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related > patches > > that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin of > Eric's series? > > Please share your thoughts. > > By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches > based on mainline? Yes. The uacce-devel branches from > https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment > (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch > https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.) Thanks. Hi Eric, Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make sense to rebase on top of either of those? >From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that. Thanks, Shameer > Thanks, > Jean