Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/virt/tdx: Remove __user annotation from kernel pointer

[Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>]

On 10/29/25 14:06, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> For the KVM side of tdx, the commits are getting prefixed with "KVM: TDX: ", and
> "x86/virt/tdx" is being used arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c. It's probably not too
> late to adopt the one true naming scheme. I don't have a strong preference
> except some consistency and that the maintainers agree :)

Yeah, I just picked one. I honestly don't care what we do in the end. I
was also probably just going to send these in the tip/x86/tdx branch
unless anyone screams, so I did it the tip-ish way.

>> There are two 'kvm_cpuid2' pointers involved here. There's an "input"
>> side: 'td_cpuid' which is a normal kernel pointer and an 'output'
>> side. The output here is userspace and there is an attempt at properly
>> annotating the variable with __user:
>>
>> 	struct kvm_cpuid2 __user *output, *td_cpuid;
>>
>> But, alas, this is wrong. The __user in the definition applies to both
>> 'output' and 'td_cpuid'.
>>
>> Fix it up by completely separating the two definitions so that it is
>> obviously correct without even having to know what the C syntax rules
>> even are.
> 
> If we want it:
> Fixes: 488808e682e7 ("KVM: x86: Introduce KVM_TDX_GET_CPUID")

Thanks for that. I might dump in in, but sometimes folks can get all hot
and bothered about getting true fixes upstream fast. I was planning to
go go the slow next-merge-window route with these.