From: Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@quicinc.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
<f.fainelli@gmail.com>, <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
<etienne.carriere@st.com>, <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>,
<michal.simek@amd.com>, <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>,
<ptosi@google.com>, <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
<souvik.chakravarty@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Make SCMI transport as standalone drivers
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 11:41:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e1e24d5-b52e-401f-b533-e64584df1d50@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240730133318.1573765-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
On 7/30/2024 6:33 AM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Till now the SCMI transport layer was being built embedded into in the core
> SCMI stack.
>
> Some of these transports, despite being currently part of the main SCMI
> module, are indeed also registered with different subsystems like optee or
> virtio, and actively probed also by those: this led to a few awkward and
> convoluted tricks to properly handle such interactions at boot time in the
> SCMI stack.
>
> Moreover some partner expressed the desire to be able to fully modularize
> the transports components.
>
> This series aim to make all such transports as standalone drivers that can
> be optionally loaded as modules.
>
> In order to do this, at first some new mechanism is introduced to support
> this new capability while maintaining, in parallel, the old legacy embedded
> transports; then each transport, one by one, is transitioned to be a
> standalone driver and finally the old legacy support for embedded transport
> is removed.
>
> Patch [1/9] is a fix around the chan_free method for OPTEE transport; it is
> really unrelated to this series, but included to avoid conflicts.
>
> Patch [2/9] is a mostly unrelated (but much needed) clean-up from Peng,
> which I included in this series to avoid conflicts at merge.
>
> Patch [3/9] simply collects the existing datagram manipulation helpers in a
> pair of function pointers structures, in preparation for later reworks.
>
> Patch [4/9] adds the bulk of the new logic to the core SCMI stack and then
> each existing transport is transitioned to be a standalone driver in
> patches 5,6,7,8 while shuffling around the compatibles. (no DT change is
> needed of curse for backward compatibility)
> While doing this I kept the module authorship in line with the main
> author(S) as spitted out by git-blame.
>
> Finally patch [9/9] removes all the legacy dead code from the core SCMI
> stack.
>
> No new symbol EXPORT has been added.
>
> The new transport drivers have been tested, as built-in and LKM, as
> follows:
>
> - mailbox on JUNO
> - virtio on emulation
> - optee on QEMU/optee using Linaro setup
>
> Exercised using the regular SCMI drivers stack and the SCMI ACS suite,
> testing commands, replies, delayed responses and notification.
>
> Multiple virtual SCMI instances support has been tested too.
>
> SMC has NOT been tested/exercised at run-time, only compile-tested.
> (due to lack of hardware)
Hi Christian,
I have validated this series on Qualcomm SA8255p(to be upstreamed) Ride
platform that uses Qualcomm SMC transport for SCMI.
Thanks,
-Nikunj
> Note that in this new setup, all the probe deferral and retries between the
> SCMI core stack and the transports has been removed, since no more needed.
>
> Moreover the new drivers have been tested also with a fully modularized
> SCMI stack, i.e.:
>
> scmi-core.ko + scmi-module.ko + scmi_transport_*.ko [ + vendor modules ]
>
> Based on v6.11-rc1
>
> Any feedback, and especially testing (:D) is welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Cristian
>
> ---
> v2 --> v3
> - rebased on v6.11-rc1
> - fixed spacing in Kconfig
> - fixed Copyrights all over
> - fixed platform_driver_register callsite in OPTEE transport
> - refactored DEFINE_SCMI_TRANSPORT_DRIVER() to:
> + use alloc + add_data + add platform drivers methods so as to implictly
> use a standard default device_release method.
> + drop .remove method in favour of devres_add_action_or_reset
> + use explicit parameter passing (no more concatenation)
> - renamed scmi_transport_lookup() to scmi_transport_setup()
> - use IOMEM_ERR_PTR to avoid sparse issues
>
> v1 --> v2
> - fixed setup_shmem_iomap to address also SMC needs (QC/nikunj)
> (silencing also warnings by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>)
> - using __free OF cleanup.h magic in setup_shmme_iomap
> - properly handle platform_driver_register() failures (Dan)
> - fixed a few commit message style
> - added a few missing static in scmi_desc
> (addresses warnings by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>)
>
>
> Cristian Marussi (8):
> firmware: arm_scmi: Fix double free in OPTEE transport
> firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce packet handling helpers
> firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for standalone transport drivers
> firmware: arm_scmi: Make MBOX transport a standalone driver
> firmware: arm_scmi: Make SMC transport a standalone driver
> firmware: arm_scmi: Make OPTEE transport a standalone driver
> firmware: arm_scmi: Make VirtIO transport a standalone driver
> firmware: arm_scmi: Remove legacy transport-layer code
>
> Peng Fan (1):
> firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce setup_shmem_iomap
>
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig | 20 +-
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile | 9 +-
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 184 +++++++++++++-----
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 142 +++++---------
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/msg.c | 32 ++-
> .../{mailbox.c => scmi_transport_mailbox.c} | 72 +++----
> .../{optee.c => scmi_transport_optee.c} | 130 ++++++-------
> .../arm_scmi/{smc.c => scmi_transport_smc.c} | 57 +++---
> .../{virtio.c => scmi_transport_virtio.c} | 102 +++++-----
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c | 85 ++++++--
> 10 files changed, 477 insertions(+), 356 deletions(-)
> rename drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/{mailbox.c => scmi_transport_mailbox.c} (86%)
> rename drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/{optee.c => scmi_transport_optee.c} (89%)
> rename drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/{smc.c => scmi_transport_smc.c} (87%)
> rename drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/{virtio.c => scmi_transport_virtio.c} (94%)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-30 13:33 Cristian Marussi
2024-07-30 13:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix double free in OPTEE transport Cristian Marussi
2024-07-30 14:37 ` Peng Fan
2024-07-30 13:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce setup_shmem_iomap Cristian Marussi
2024-07-30 13:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce packet handling helpers Cristian Marussi
2024-07-30 13:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for standalone transport drivers Cristian Marussi
2024-07-30 13:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Make MBOX transport a standalone driver Cristian Marussi
2024-08-06 13:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-08-06 14:59 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-07-30 13:33 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Make SMC " Cristian Marussi
2024-08-01 18:46 ` Nikunj Kela
2024-08-01 19:21 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-07-30 13:33 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Make OPTEE " Cristian Marussi
2024-07-31 6:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-01 19:22 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-07-30 13:33 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Make VirtIO " Cristian Marussi
2024-07-31 6:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-01 19:25 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-07-30 13:33 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Remove legacy transport-layer code Cristian Marussi
2024-07-31 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Make SCMI transport as standalone drivers Peng Fan
2024-08-01 18:41 ` Nikunj Kela [this message]
2024-08-06 16:47 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-08-06 17:01 ` Cristian Marussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e1e24d5-b52e-401f-b533-e64584df1d50@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_nkela@quicinc.com \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=etienne.carriere@st.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=ptosi@google.com \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=souvik.chakravarty@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®