From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.17.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9462041A8F; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 08:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.17.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713427428; cv=none; b=a+bfdYRhNdOeJl7f1AAEjtRJZH8hfna5lrI7qSn5POCTSK+J8+BF7C8rWKpyvmY8mQ/kTYb5him6dzaAilvSAXaw7yitimAN6XhXD9bCU2FcPY1mTn9V1k18yEys7BVs3TD99IpSwMWsMizRzq6fYIWFIlyH7pCtvc8vQHLNCiE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713427428; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dn1VO7viEgZ4LDDcok3HMC0OL5AUmtyZDWLo64Dkul0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=efr1M8acezV9rvORKO1oopz7kc/QRXxpfYjGzULvFL3lOT3WvqvCrWyg/yTmBTAm7pF7nijToLKhXoBq1g8cv33KqakBe4fHLWMxnHNsU0rcmxLV/Tjqtl0OqrKOFqAnT0Jh47ou+bJk605a+nHO/U//TTSpEja1vJcCA5LycZE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=web.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=web.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=web.de header.i=markus.elfring@web.de header.b=ZuvLafE6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.17.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=web.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=web.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=web.de header.i=markus.elfring@web.de header.b="ZuvLafE6" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1713427399; x=1714032199; i=markus.elfring@web.de; bh=dn1VO7viEgZ4LDDcok3HMC0OL5AUmtyZDWLo64Dkul0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc: References:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:cc:content-transfer-encoding: content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject: to; b=ZuvLafE6eFCkQLxSqrdhFO8iX/0R4L6hhJ1pxizfjg4T34+fHCasQ4gW57BadqNS 13V7RL19HGP/NNg2vajTFwIxfH3zajxgtjxjq+uWHHpGjD5ibxu85Q/sT0+3Uyccw Y/mrYeGBxDgvqj/MPUwVQI48rXwQtOhKpvpK3Aumiz5T4ZUlTvRI7oEReyZ/Vsa/5 76LiE+RHTayx/aPdgQEt4xCa/R4G3FsxAIsv3PKnmpgrwvh5pRjIGIkbfAFddsNIU gbiBOYRmhMRi8na2Fa7olZqYEYcQYcV4IQ9h2/+h0h1qtxl6w/Bzq9v2ww9ifMzpH WXo3sm2zPSgQ1fhXPA== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([94.31.85.95]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MFJnX-1rvSwQ2LnN-00FOuD; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:03:19 +0200 Message-ID: <2e2078e1-9a29-4bac-ab22-8f82199e9e14@web.de> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:02:57 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: net: bcmasp: Patch review challenges To: Simon Horman , Florian Fainelli , Justin Chen , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Cc: LKML , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni References: <20240412181631.3488324-1-justin.chen@broadcom.com> <6881c322-8fbb-422f-bdbb-392a83d0b326@web.de> <9afad2b3-38a5-470d-a66f-10aa2cba3bab@broadcom.com> <8ae97386-876f-45cf-9e82-af082d8ea338@web.de> <20240417161933.GA2320920@kernel.org> <3a5cb80e-7169-4e82-b10c-843ff1eb0fd3@broadcom.com> <20240417203430.GB3935777@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-GB From: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: <20240417203430.GB3935777@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:lsJcvgvXFrg7UgLN5XFxyC1tZvrAOsSGuAX2rB09jVoGO1fAhAh zyCuWPXmw7fdk6sjRo3Gn5LfAVwmRIvaBuzzRN3iveCNCtWCBnG4eCZw+195tX831Epm6x6 i/kNp4Qlg7Q+uvE5ehl3/761hV7miLeMcUUkH8PjHrlb6JxxMdkHKlHTKO7uCDpyLcy64ZB rxJusUKyfX9ssm70Nft7A== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:yAIWmufHDr4=;1ab9tlrDq8iO7fChUuBobeRxyxE LyAvEIGg0bqF3/cRsxG023m7NVvf6FCLuttIFalyd8knENUqcSicgRYoBrJ1jnR49lLJ780nP 9/40SBV3J8va2XNetmiBLvX7sHStz04glgIUn5AuINFoyHxeKbBAvtr2Zk4MOcPOFBJks9v5e vH92dufw5DrL6tl2KsrgDswS+SvWNVxlxQk6Kh4xMEdHwBp+yZ2ZoGwvsay4sD3rqhWAVrVFk sm21cwvP2I+HHBVrrCyQGDt0q6kDJaG+fMTu6uNjveKAmwm9ych3ZawQkfP0tRQ5aTw5bjiXI Fq1wCjjJC0yxQbFW8U9v/pmg2qp1VMgtkOx2cUB0x8zRBqjW1f65Rjr0AvZk+j88xU5RTIaAS D2ZOwOvC6Dp1M6p7xLvWbpk8AJ4GmNzP/jaLbvRJaQ0yy/L/B7SJPHIAzOAM0ZmArA3S7N9qP Am8Twcc9qRWWdvqy90NT0hXbKGSSbRct/8iGVMKuoLNAaQ+f/J18Y+eGwXUj/0uT/QyMlM5yF j7ELWqXjyxF0u2M/D3l8emi5TwjgYtWeqxYRuf0o3Ei8orKHEZILhuZOtOOfyo2URv7zvrQV+ y1jx/wKANqrmAJq57egt2BshQKlzz4N3ebfjBXpZgGbJ6fdHlFujhzvKFL9KeR8BQS/EkMwmY af/wIIsMLW/F30V4cI5cM3iX6bVNeTvbYtsEt8KocvUlIohQ2gFlMFuIhhQHX+vkAs1WE/+Ul B/km1njBM79Y/k7LGEs7ywm83EmgAlwZXOThreXmW89RotQkgo0RU5cMNloYD86G0CK+dEzNx XfuiMAY+perzgThN/Sm+Xjlw9OTI5b5QOCcnDNjnSxav4= > On reflection, my previous email was inappropriate. I find such a response interesting. > I do have reservations about the review provided by Markus, Which factors are influencing this view? > but should not reacted as I did. I apologise to every for that. Will clarification opportunities become more constructive accordingly? Regards, Markus