From: Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <mukesh.savaliya@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org, dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com,
bjorn.andersson@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: prasad.sodagudi@oss.qualcomm.com, quic_vtanuku@quicinc.com,
aniket.randive@oss.qualcomm.com,
chandana.chiluveru@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] soc: qcom: geni-se: Introduce helper APIs for performance control
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 19:13:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e5b3197-65fb-471d-9ee1-0f7794f88cce@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85bb3a9f-d54a-4b4c-8dbb-6d5461ebb037@oss.qualcomm.com>
Hi Konrad,
On 2/20/2026 10:53 AM, Praveen Talari wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
>
> On 2/17/2026 5:55 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 2/4/26 6:42 AM, Praveen Talari wrote:
>>> Hi Konrad,
>>>
>>> On 2/3/2026 4:44 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 1/30/26 5:54 PM, Praveen Talari wrote:
>>>>> Hi Konrad
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/30/2026 5:53 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/12/26 11:47 AM, Praveen Talari wrote:
>>>>>>> The GENI Serial Engine (SE) drivers (I2C, SPI, and SERIAL) currently
>>>>>>> manage performance levels and operating points directly. This
>>>>>>> resulting
>>>>>>> in code duplication across drivers. such as configuring a
>>>>>>> specific level
>>>>>>> or find and apply an OPP based on a clock frequency.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Introduce two new helper APIs, geni_se_set_perf_level() and
>>>>>>> geni_se_set_perf_opp(), addresses this issue by providing a
>>>>>>> streamlined
>>>>>>> method for the GENI Serial Engine (SE) drivers to find and set
>>>>>>> the OPP
>>>>>>> based on the desired performance level, thereby eliminating
>>>>>>> redundancy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>>> + * geni_se_set_perf_level() - Set performance level for GENI SE.
>>>>>>> + * @se: Pointer to the struct geni_se instance.
>>>>>>> + * @level: The desired performance level.
>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>> + * Sets the performance level by directly calling
>>>>>>> dev_pm_opp_set_level
>>>>>>> + * on the performance device associated with the SE.
>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>> + * Return: 0 on success, or a negative error code on failure.
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> +int geni_se_set_perf_level(struct geni_se *se, unsigned long level)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + return dev_pm_opp_set_level(se->pd_list-
>>>>>>> >pd_devs[DOMAIN_IDX_PERF], level);
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(geni_se_set_perf_level);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This function is never used
>>>>>
>>>>> it will be used by UART driver, not for I2C/SPI.
>>>>
>>>> Adding unused exported symbols is "eeeh"..
>>>
>>> I keep in mind for UART, i have added this API.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>>> + * geni_se_set_perf_opp() - Set performance OPP for GENI SE by
>>>>>>> frequency.
>>>>>>> + * @se: Pointer to the struct geni_se instance.
>>>>>>> + * @clk_freq: The requested clock frequency.
>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>> + * Finds the nearest operating performance point (OPP) for the
>>>>>>> given
>>>>>>> + * clock frequency and applies it to the SE's performance device.
>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>> + * Return: 0 on success, or a negative error code on failure.
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> +int geni_se_set_perf_opp(struct geni_se *se, unsigned long
>>>>>>> clk_freq)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think with the SPI driver in mind (which seems to do a simple
>>>>>> rateset
>>>>>
>>>>> APIs were added as generic interfaces shared across I²C/SPI which
>>>>> is specific to firmware control, not Linux control.
>>>>>
>>>>>> for both backends) we could do:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + struct device *perf_dev = se->pd_list-
>>>>>>> >pd_devs[DOMAIN_IDX_PERF];
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then, we can do struct device * perf_dev = se->dev;
>>>>> I don't think, it is needed since this is specific to firmware
>>>>> control, not Linux control.
>>>>
>>>> My point is that it doesn't have to be specific to the auto usecase,
>>>> further commonizing the code.
>>>
>>> This API will not useful for non-auto cases as well.
>>
>> This is only because you make it so, with the above suggestion we could
>> do without the .set_rate abstraction in the SPI driver which only does
>> an opp_set_rate in the generic case
>
> For the generic .set_rate path (which is managed by Linux), we do more
> than just call dev_pm_opp_set_rate(). The .set_rate callback also
> performs additional hardware‑specific configuration as part of the rate
> change.
>
> SPI enablement on SA8255P follows this generic (non‑SCMI) path:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260112190134.1526646-5-
> praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com/
>
> Below is the reference implementation of .set_rate used for the generic
> (non‑SCMI) case:
>
> +static const struct geni_spi_desc geni_spi = {
> + .resources_init = geni_se_resources_init,
> + .set_rate = geni_spi_set_clock_and_bw,
> + .power_on = geni_se_resources_activate,
> + .power_off = geni_se_resources_deactivate,
> +};
>
>
> static int geni_spi_set_clock_and_bw(struct spi_geni_master *mas,
> unsigned long clk_hz)
> {
> u32 clk_sel, m_clk_cfg, idx, div;
> struct geni_se *se = &mas->se;
> int ret;
>
> if (clk_hz == mas->cur_speed_hz)
> return 0;
>
> ret = get_spi_clk_cfg(clk_hz, mas, &idx, &div);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(mas->dev, "Err setting clk to %lu: %d\n", clk_hz, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> /*
> * SPI core clock gets configured with the requested frequency
> * or the frequency closer to the requested frequency.
> * For that reason requested frequency is stored in the
> * cur_speed_hz and referred in the consecutive transfer instead
> * of calling clk_get_rate() API.
> */
> mas->cur_speed_hz = clk_hz;
>
> clk_sel = idx & CLK_SEL_MSK;
> m_clk_cfg = (div << CLK_DIV_SHFT) | SER_CLK_EN;
> writel(clk_sel, se->base + SE_GENI_CLK_SEL);
> writel(m_clk_cfg, se->base + GENI_SER_M_CLK_CFG);
>
> /* Set BW quota for CPU as driver supports FIFO mode only. */
> se->icc_paths[CPU_TO_GENI].avg_bw = Bps_to_icc(mas->cur_speed_hz);
> ret = geni_icc_set_bw(se);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> In geni_spi_set_clock_and_bw(), the driver not only programs the SPI
> clock, but also updates internal state and configures ICC bandwidth.
>
> In particular, dev_pm_opp_set_rate() and dev_pm_opp_set_opp() serve
> different purposes and are not interchangeable.
> dev_pm_opp_set_rate() selects an OPP based on the requested frequency,
> performs clock rounding, and programs both clocks and power supplies
> accordingly.
>
> On the other hand, dev_pm_opp_set_opp() assumes that the target OPP is
> already known and applies it directly, without any frequency‑based
> selection or rounding.
>
> Given these differences, replacing dev_pm_opp_set_rate() with
> geni_se_set_perf_opp() would not be equivalent in the generic .set_rate
> flow.
>
>
>
> /**
> * dev_pm_opp_set_rate() - Configure new OPP based on frequency
> * @dev: device for which we do this operation
> * @target_freq: frequency to achieve
> *
> * This configures the power-supplies to the levels specified by the OPP
> * corresponding to the target_freq, and programs the clock to a value <=
> * target_freq, as rounded by clk_round_rate(). Device wanting to run
> at fmax
> * provided by the opp, should have already rounded to the target OPP's
> * frequency.
> */
> int dev_pm_opp_set_rate(struct device *dev, unsigned long target_freq)
> {
> struct opp_table *opp_table __free(put_opp_table);
> struct dev_pm_opp *opp __free(put_opp) = NULL;
> unsigned long freq = 0, temp_freq;
> bool forced = false;
>
> opp_table = _find_opp_table(dev);
> if (IS_ERR(opp_table)) {
> dev_err(dev, "%s: device's opp table doesn't exist\n", __func__);
> return PTR_ERR(opp_table);
> }
>
> if (target_freq) {
> /*
> * For IO devices which require an OPP on some platforms/SoCs
> * while just needing to scale the clock on some others
> * we look for empty OPP tables with just a clock handle and
> * scale only the clk. This makes dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
> * equivalent to a clk_set_rate()
> */
> if (!_get_opp_count(opp_table)) {
> return opp_table->config_clks(dev, opp_table, NULL,
> &target_freq, false);
> }
>
> freq = clk_round_rate(opp_table->clk, target_freq);
> if ((long)freq <= 0)
> freq = target_freq;
>
> /*
> * The clock driver may support finer resolution of the
> * frequencies than the OPP table, don't update the frequency we
> * pass to clk_set_rate() here.
> */
> temp_freq = freq;
> opp = _find_freq_ceil(opp_table, &temp_freq);
> if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
> dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to find OPP for freq %lu (%ld)\n",
> __func__, freq, PTR_ERR(opp));
> return PTR_ERR(opp);
> }
>
> /*
> * An OPP entry specifies the highest frequency at which other
> * properties of the OPP entry apply. Even if the new OPP is
> * same as the old one, we may still reach here for a different
> * value of the frequency. In such a case, do not abort but
> * configure the hardware to the desired frequency forcefully.
> */
> forced = opp_table->current_rate_single_clk != freq;
> }
>
> return _set_opp(dev, opp_table, opp, &freq, forced);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_set_rate);
>
> /**
> * dev_pm_opp_set_opp() - Configure device for OPP
> * @dev: device for which we do this operation
> * @opp: OPP to set to
> *
> * This configures the device based on the properties of the OPP passed
> to this
> * routine.
> *
> * Return: 0 on success, a negative error number otherwise.
> */
> int dev_pm_opp_set_opp(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
> {
> struct opp_table *opp_table __free(put_opp_table);
>
> opp_table = _find_opp_table(dev);
> if (IS_ERR(opp_table)) {
> dev_err(dev, "%s: device opp doesn't exist\n", __func__);
> return PTR_ERR(opp_table);
> }
>
> return _set_opp(dev, opp_table, opp, NULL, false);
> }
>
> Please correct me if my understanding is incorrect.
I hope the above has addressed your concern.
Thanks,
Praveen
>
>
> Thanks,
> Praveen Talari
>>
>> Konrad
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-23 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-12 10:47 [PATCH v3 00/12] Enable I2C on SA8255p Qualcomm platforms Praveen Talari
2026-01-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] soc: qcom: geni-se: Refactor geni_icc_get() and make qup-memory ICC path optional Praveen Talari
2026-01-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] soc: qcom: geni-se: Add geni_icc_set_bw_ab() function Praveen Talari
2026-01-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] soc: qcom: geni-se: Introduce helper API for resource initialization Praveen Talari
2026-01-30 12:10 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-01-30 17:00 ` Praveen Talari
2026-01-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] soc: qcom: geni-se: Add resources activation/deactivation helpers Praveen Talari
2026-01-30 12:11 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-02 16:20 ` Praveen Talari
2026-01-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] soc: qcom: geni-se: Introduce helper API for attaching power domains Praveen Talari
2026-01-30 12:12 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-01-30 16:55 ` Praveen Talari
2026-02-02 16:19 ` Praveen Talari
2026-01-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] soc: qcom: geni-se: Introduce helper APIs for performance control Praveen Talari
2026-01-30 12:23 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-01-30 16:54 ` Praveen Talari
2026-02-03 11:14 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-04 5:42 ` Praveen Talari
2026-02-17 12:25 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-20 5:23 ` Praveen Talari
2026-02-23 13:43 ` Praveen Talari [this message]
2026-02-25 14:25 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-01-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] dt-bindings: i2c: Describe SA8255p Praveen Talari
2026-01-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] i2c: qcom-geni: Isolate serial engine setup Praveen Talari
2026-01-21 7:47 ` Viken Dadhaniya
2026-01-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] i2c: qcom-geni: Move resource initialization to separate function Praveen Talari
2026-01-21 8:57 ` Viken Dadhaniya
2026-01-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] i2c: qcom-geni: Use resources helper APIs in runtime PM functions Praveen Talari
2026-01-21 8:58 ` Viken Dadhaniya
2026-01-30 12:05 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-01-30 16:48 ` Praveen Talari
2026-02-03 11:13 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-04 5:46 ` Praveen Talari
2026-01-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] i2c: qcom-geni: Store of_device_id data in driver private struct Praveen Talari
2026-01-21 8:59 ` Viken Dadhaniya
2026-01-30 12:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-02 16:19 ` Praveen Talari
2026-01-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] i2c: qcom-geni: Enable I2C on SA8255p Qualcomm platforms Praveen Talari
2026-01-21 10:21 ` Viken Dadhaniya
2026-01-30 12:34 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-01-30 16:44 ` Praveen Talari
2026-02-02 14:53 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-04 5:43 ` Praveen Talari
2026-01-14 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] " Andi Shyti
2026-01-28 22:49 ` [SPAM] " Andi Shyti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e5b3197-65fb-471d-9ee1-0f7794f88cce@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=aniket.randive@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=chandana.chiluveru@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mukesh.savaliya@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=prasad.sodagudi@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=quic_vtanuku@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=viken.dadhaniya@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®