mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vankar, Chintan" <c-vankar@ti.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <s-vadapalli@ti.com>, <danishanwar@ti.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Extend mmio-mux driver to configure mux with new DT property
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 22:35:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e80f6bc-2fb0-4f0d-9450-cbcf4dddca66@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f844e44e-6b71-442a-ae3c-7bbe74a908af@ti.com>

Hello Greg,

I have tried to implement Timesync Router node to the suitable
Subsystems (Interrupt controller and Mux-controller). Thomas
has provided a feedback with a reason why Timesync Router is not
suitable for irqchip. But I didn't get a proper feedback for mux-
controller subsystem.

Can you please help me deciding in which subsystem I should implement
it, if not mux-controller can it go in drivers/misc ?

Regards,
Chintan.

On 5/20/2025 10:59 AM, Chintan Vankar wrote:
> Hello Peter,
> 
> I am trying to implement a driver for hardware module called Timesync
> Router which is present on almost all the SoCs of Texas Instruments and
> I need your advise to implement it.
> 
> Timesync Router provides a mechanism to mux M input to N outputs, where
> all M inputs are selectable to be driven per N output.
> 
>                           ________________________
>                          |    Timesync INTR       +---->dma_local_events
>                          |                        |
>   Device sync events----->                        +---->pcie_cpts_hw_push
>                          |                        |
>            cpts_genf----->                        +---->cpts_hw_push
>                          |________________________|
> 
> 
> Diagram shows a very concise view of Timesync Router. It receives
> signals from multiple modules and routes the same on the other side. To
> configure the functionality, we need to program output registers of
> Timesync Router to configure it with the input signal. One of the
> application of Timesync Router is to generate a PPS signal for CPTS
> module. Timesync Router receives periodic signals generated by CPTS
> module as shown "cpts_genf" in diagram and it can be routed via Timesync
> Router as a Hardware Push Events as shown "cpts_hw_push" in diagram.
> 
> The functionality of Timesync Router seems very much identical to the
> mux-controller, specifically mmio driver present in the mux subsystem.
> I have also posted a detailed explanation on how can we modify mmio
> driver which can work as a generic driver for the hardware module
> identical to Timesync Router at here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/1ce1fc6b-fc16-4fb7-9f68-57b495aa5eae@ti.com/
> 
> I have also tried to implement this module with irq subsystem:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205160119.136639-1-c-vankar@ti.com/, for
> which I received a response from the Thomas Gleixner that why it cannot
> be included in the irq subsystem:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ikp8jph9.ffs@tglx/.
> 
> After receiving feedback on the Interrupt Router implementation, I tried
> to implement it as a mux-controller which seems more relevant subsystem
> for Timesync Router. Can you please advise me whether it can be included
> in the mux-controller subsystem or not ?
> 
> Regards,
> Chintan.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 04/03/25 15:53, Chintan Vankar wrote:
>> This series extends mmio-mux driver's capability to configure driver in
>> with extended property.
>>
>> In current driver implementation, driver is parsing register's offset,
>> mask and value from two different device tree property which makes it
>> complex to specify a specific register or set of registers. Introducing
>> mux-reg-masks-states will make it easier to specify the same values for
>> particular register or set of registers.
>>
>> This series is based on linux next tagged next-20250303.
>>
>> Link to v1:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250227202206.2551305-1-c-vankar@ti.com/
>>
>> Changes from v1 to v2:
>> - Updated dt-bindings for the required conditions as suggested by Conor
>>    Dooley and Andrew Davis.
>> - Modified driver changes as pointed out by Andrew Davis.
>>
>> Chintan Vankar (2):
>>    devicetree: bindings: mux: reg-mux: Update bindings for reg-mux for
>>      new property
>>    mux: mmio: Extend mmio-mux driver to configure mux with new DT
>>      property
>>
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/mux/reg-mux.yaml      |  28 +++-
>>   drivers/mux/mmio.c                            | 144 ++++++++++++++----
>>   2 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-30 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04 10:23 Chintan Vankar
2025-03-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] devicetree: bindings: mux: reg-mux: Update bindings for reg-mux for new property Chintan Vankar
2025-03-04 10:47   ` Vankar, Chintan
2025-03-04 15:39   ` Rob Herring
2025-03-04 19:03     ` Vankar, Chintan
2025-03-04 20:40       ` Rob Herring
2025-03-05 21:43         ` Vankar, Chintan
2025-03-05 22:14           ` Rob Herring
2025-03-05 22:30             ` Vankar, Chintan
2025-04-22  8:42               ` Chintan Vankar
2025-03-04 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mux: mmio: Extend mmio-mux driver to configure mux with new DT property Chintan Vankar
2025-05-20  5:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] " Chintan Vankar
2025-05-30 17:05   ` Vankar, Chintan [this message]
2025-05-31  5:52     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-31  9:37       ` Vankar, Chintan
2025-05-31 12:28         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2e80f6bc-2fb0-4f0d-9450-cbcf4dddca66@ti.com \
    --to=c-vankar@ti.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=danishanwar@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®