mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>, devel@linuxdriverproject.org
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv_balloon: avoid touching uninitialized struct page during tail onlining
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 11:21:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ea7e975-6aae-de71-83e5-9302518802ef@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190104141942.19126-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>

On 04.01.19 15:19, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hyper-V memory hotplug protocol has 2M granularity and in Linux x86 we use
> 128M. To deal with it we implement partial section onlining by registering
> custom page onlining callback (hv_online_page()). Later, when more memory
> arrives we try to online the 'tail' (see hv_bring_pgs_online()).
> 
> It was found that in some cases this 'tail' onlining causes issues:
> 
>  BUG: Bad page state in process kworker/0:2  pfn:109e3a
>  page:ffffe08344278e80 count:0 mapcount:1 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0
>  flags: 0xfffff80000000()
>  raw: 000fffff80000000 dead000000000100 dead000000000200 0000000000000000
>  raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>  page dumped because: nonzero mapcount
>  ...
>  Workqueue: events hot_add_req [hv_balloon]
>  Call Trace:
>   dump_stack+0x5c/0x80
>   bad_page.cold.112+0x7f/0xb2
>   free_pcppages_bulk+0x4b8/0x690
>   free_unref_page+0x54/0x70
>   hv_page_online_one+0x5c/0x80 [hv_balloon]
>   hot_add_req.cold.24+0x182/0x835 [hv_balloon]
>   ...
> 
> Turns out that we now have deferred struct page initialization for memory
> hotplug so e.g. memory_block_action() in drivers/base/memory.c does
> pages_correctly_probed() check and in that check it avoids inspecting
> struct pages and checks sections instead. But in Hyper-V balloon driver we
> do PageReserved(pfn_to_page()) check and this is now wrong.
> 
> Switch to checking online_section_nr() instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c b/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
> index 5301fef16c31..7c6349a50ef1 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
> @@ -888,12 +888,14 @@ static unsigned long handle_pg_range(unsigned long pg_start,
>  			pfn_cnt -= pgs_ol;
>  			/*
>  			 * Check if the corresponding memory block is already
> -			 * online by checking its last previously backed page.
> -			 * In case it is we need to bring rest (which was not
> -			 * backed previously) online too.
> +			 * online. It is possible to observe struct pages still
> +			 * being uninitialized here so check section instead.
> +			 * In case the section is online we need to bring the
> +			 * rest of pfns (which were not backed previously)
> +			 * online too.
>  			 */
>  			if (start_pfn > has->start_pfn &&
> -			    !PageReserved(pfn_to_page(start_pfn - 1)))
> +			    online_section_nr(pfn_to_section_nr(start_pfn)))
>  				hv_bring_pgs_online(has, start_pfn, pgs_ol);
>  
>  		}
> 

I wonder if you should use pfn_to_online_page() and check for PageOffline().

(I guess online_section_nr() should also do the trick)

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-07 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-04 14:19 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-01-07 10:21 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-01-07 13:44   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-01-07 17:56     ` Sasha Levin
2019-01-07 18:38       ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-01-08  6:41         ` Greg KH
2019-01-08  9:47         ` Dan Carpenter
2019-01-08 14:34           ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-01-08 21:23         ` Sasha Levin
2019-01-08  9:15     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-01-08  9:42       ` Vitaly Kuznetsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ea7e975-6aae-de71-83e5-9302518802ef@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome