mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>,
	Billows Wu <billows.wu@spreadtrum.com>,
	zhang.lyra@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/7] mmc: sdhci: made changes for System Address register of SDMA
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:22:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2eb994d3-7f23-6ff8-4740-7a444a581e9d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1529028255-6022-3-git-send-email-zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>

On 15/06/18 05:04, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> According to the SD host controller specification version 4.10, when
> Host Version 4 is enabled, SDMA uses ADMA System Address register
> (05Fh-058h) instead of using SDMA System Address register to
> support both 32-bit and 64-bit addressing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index cf5695f..f57201f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -805,6 +805,7 @@ static void sdhci_set_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
>  static void sdhci_prepare_data(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
>  {
>  	u8 ctrl;
> +	u32 reg;

reg could just be an int.

>  	struct mmc_data *data = cmd->data;
>  
>  	if (sdhci_data_line_cmd(cmd))
> @@ -894,8 +895,10 @@ static void sdhci_prepare_data(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
>  					     SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS_HI);
>  		} else {
>  			WARN_ON(sg_cnt != 1);
> +			reg = host->v4_mode ? SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS :
> +				SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS;
>  			sdhci_writel(host, sdhci_sdma_address(host),
> -				     SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS);
> +				     reg);

Shouldn't we support 64-bit SDMA in version 4 mode?


>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2721,6 +2724,7 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
>  		 */
>  		if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DMA_END) {
>  			u32 dmastart, dmanow;
> +			u32 reg;
>  
>  			dmastart = sdhci_sdma_address(host);
>  			dmanow = dmastart + host->data->bytes_xfered;
> @@ -2733,7 +2737,9 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
>  			host->data->bytes_xfered = dmanow - dmastart;
>  			DBG("DMA base 0x%08x, transferred 0x%06x bytes, next 0x%08x\n",
>  			    dmastart, host->data->bytes_xfered, dmanow);
> -			sdhci_writel(host, dmanow, SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS);
> +			reg = host->v4_mode ? SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS :
> +				SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS;
> +			sdhci_writel(host, dmanow, reg);

Shouldn't we support 64-bit SDMA in version 4 mode?

>  		}
>  
>  		if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_END) {
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-21 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-15  2:04 [PATCH V2 0/7] mmc: add support for sdhci 4.0 Chunyan Zhang
2018-06-15  2:04 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] mmc: sdhci: add sd host v4 mode Chunyan Zhang
2018-06-21 10:49   ` Adrian Hunter
2018-06-21 11:14     ` Chunyan Zhang
2018-06-21 13:15       ` Adrian Hunter
2018-07-04  3:02         ` Chunyan Zhang
2018-06-15  2:04 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] mmc: sdhci: made changes for System Address register of SDMA Chunyan Zhang
2018-06-21 11:22   ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2018-07-04  3:02     ` Chunyan Zhang
2018-06-15  2:04 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] mmc: sdhci: add ADMA2 64-bit addressing support for V4 mode Chunyan Zhang
2018-06-21 13:20   ` Adrian Hunter
2018-07-04  3:03     ` Chunyan Zhang
2018-06-15  2:04 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] mmc: sdhci: add 32-bit block count support for v4 mode Chunyan Zhang
2018-06-15  2:04 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] mmc: sdhci: add CMD23 " Chunyan Zhang
2018-06-22 19:40   ` Adrian Hunter
2018-07-04  3:03     ` Chunyan Zhang
2018-06-15  2:04 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] mmc: sdhci-sprd: added Spreadtrum's initial host controller Chunyan Zhang
2018-06-15  9:36   ` [PATCH V3 " Chunyan Zhang
2018-06-18  8:56     ` Ulf Hansson
2018-06-15  2:04 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] dt-bindings: sdhci-sprd: Add bindings for the sdhci-sprd controller Chunyan Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2eb994d3-7f23-6ff8-4740-7a444a581e9d@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
    --cc=billows.wu@spreadtrum.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhang.chunyan@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®