From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9C6C7EE29 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2023 00:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235943AbjFIA0N (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:26:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42780 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229605AbjFIA0K (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:26:10 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2402D72; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 17:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-652328c18d5so937427b3a.1; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 17:26:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1686270369; x=1688862369; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=SsLHpUV3U4RHcYmttv82/JvsSyFIcyIPeIQmZazPerg=; b=JVxMAS5Rql8+6bB8cFnlTJE1Y+0PDTB5UwnRSgYerzJLulSMpalR6I9yuAcrJp2oZG pyktcLw+3fZ6jEQx9/pTy5xKcYdSTO4jgULDn0kS3QgFQ68O9oouVPSDfGhPGqyBtK/t s1x53uaxxiVHwYGaLoSPg4ZRrcAxJdnrKLkRIiNMgAaDOr3ekZ6GOX2JWE8n721BeJc0 bKnKNdgd2P7ouW95NZPekHQaIYaoeLoJnIwoHhg6hi8gYOluOWmJ3vMGPgnWJMnyppgw mOZpLLgzrdV1Yn213xCgdn6CtR/7I1GiyinI6EWoR/GgCQSLtIWI9wSG++l6V6XaYFDf fF0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686270369; x=1688862369; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SsLHpUV3U4RHcYmttv82/JvsSyFIcyIPeIQmZazPerg=; b=cOdvQkH4rbHr7hd7lWWnUgrOoQycWYLrPeawwpr9DFrHMWtY++BGOa0ta2wFIqb4DM SzT5LmNPaJ1VIyQE8tiu+DqFw9NIkZRDrdyYG4mQ+dVqIcBog4jNIleDARgAPBho7zvr SUpgaEn54jo4Vuuo51FwGpiDapuraPw+J1FI/aVkdSVYUo4G+X4TqmPBFW2kgINKcpwL j1C+RbGwcOeBXV4JlOUF7DkWzMjr8KvwJ/0GF62NSeLMO6kLl7HAO4B2aefic2wL+ZyR ybJklqLdhq0Udq94gh4k+dj7n9pbdtPL4LgAm1VDNAJYPdulKxqS/o9BYgtVOI3NVslQ EndQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyhW+ZLiLqMsSGnm1gMqGeo1tdzMnJk38NGlZ8oNLH0KvABtRBh 06LYILpCyJYO6v2JUK8GfKM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5RHs5idAHmUIW80YZUdFMTvAyPG7GtZS73qmDLkqkEZVWKhZn3UsojLdEcAAL5NpXAKUMBew== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:6d91:b0:10d:3ff2:452b with SMTP id wl17-20020a056a216d9100b0010d3ff2452bmr5743417pzb.18.1686270369049; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 17:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s64-20020a635e43000000b0053efc8ac7e9sm1771643pgb.29.2023.06.08.17.26.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Jun 2023 17:26:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 17:26:06 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/61] 4.14.317-rc1 review Message-ID: <2ec644ea-e58e-44da-9bc8-25cf9a942714@roeck-us.net> References: <20230607200835.310274198@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230607200835.310274198@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 10:15:14PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.317 release. > There are 61 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 09 Jun 2023 20:07:31 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 168 pass: 167 fail: 1 Failed builds: x86_64:tools/perf Qemu test results: total: 430 pass: 430 fail: 0 I don't know what causes the perf build failure; there has been no change. I suspect it is because I recently switched from Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04. I don't think it is worth bothering; I'll just stop build testing perf on that branch. Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Guenter