From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Gui-Dong Han <hanguidong02@outlook.com>,
linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atm/fore200e: Consolidate available cell rate update to prevent race condition
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:39:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ed41eff-284c-4c44-8090-d2c1765ab6b5@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ME3P282MB3617E02526BEE4B295478B1AC0C72@ME3P282MB3617.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
> In fore200e_change_qos, there is a race condition due to two consecutive
> updates to the 'available_cell_rate' variable. If a read operation
> occurs between these updates, an intermediate value might be read,
> leading to potential bugs.
* Would you like to explain a bit more why you find the applied mutex
insufficient for data synchronisation aspects?
* Is any special analysis tool (like “BassCheck”) involved in such a contribution?
> To fix this issue, 'available_cell_rate' should be adjusted in a single
> operation, ensuring consistency and preventing any intermediate states
> from being read.
* Please improve the change description with an imperative wording.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc2#n94
* How do you think about to specify the name of the affected function
in the summary phrase?
* I would like to point out that similar source code adjustments can be achieved
also by the means of the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software).
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-11 3:54 Gui-Dong Han
2024-06-11 7:39 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2024-06-14 12:23 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ed41eff-284c-4c44-8090-d2c1765ab6b5@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=3chas3@gmail.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=hanguidong02@outlook.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®