Re: [PATCH] udmabuf: add vmap method to udmabuf_ops

["Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>]

Adding Dmitry as well.

Am 11.11.22 um 12:45 schrieb Lukasz Wiecaszek:
> The reason behind that patch is associated with videobuf2 subsystem
> (or more genrally with v4l2 framework) and user created
> dma buffers (udmabuf). In some circumstances
> when dealing with V4L2_MEMORY_DMABUF buffers videobuf2 subsystem
> wants to use dma_buf_vmap() method on the attached dma buffer.
> As udmabuf does not have .vmap operation implemented,
> such dma_buf_vmap() natually fails.
>
> videobuf2_common: [cap-000000003473b2f1] __vb2_queue_alloc: allocated 3 buffers, 1 plane(s) each
> videobuf2_common: [cap-000000003473b2f1] __prepare_dmabuf: buffer for plane 0 changed
> videobuf2_common: [cap-000000003473b2f1] __prepare_dmabuf: failed to map dmabuf for plane 0
> videobuf2_common: [cap-000000003473b2f1] __buf_prepare: buffer preparation failed: -14
>
> The patch itself seems to be strighforward.
> It adds implementation of .vmap method to 'struct dma_buf_ops udmabuf_ops'.
> .vmap method itself uses vm_map_ram() to map pages linearly
> into the kernel virtual address space (only if such mapping
> hasn't been created yet).

Of hand that sounds sane to me.

You should probably mention somewhere in a code comment that the cached 
vaddr is protected by the reservation lock being taken. That's not 
necessary obvious to everybody.

Apart from that looks good to me.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Wiecaszek <lukasz.wiecaszek@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
> index 2bcdb935a3ac..8649fcbd05c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>   #include <linux/udmabuf.h>
>   #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
> +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>   
>   static int list_limit = 1024;
>   module_param(list_limit, int, 0644);
> @@ -26,6 +27,7 @@ struct udmabuf {
>   	struct page **pages;
>   	struct sg_table *sg;
>   	struct miscdevice *device;
> +	void *vaddr;
>   };
>   
>   static vm_fault_t udmabuf_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> @@ -57,6 +59,21 @@ static int mmap_udmabuf(struct dma_buf *buf, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int vmap_udmabuf(struct dma_buf *buf, struct dma_buf_map *map)
> +{
> +	struct udmabuf *ubuf = buf->priv;
> +
> +	if (!ubuf->vaddr) {
> +		ubuf->vaddr = vm_map_ram(ubuf->pages, ubuf->pagecount, -1);
> +		if (!ubuf->vaddr)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	dma_buf_map_set_vaddr(map, ubuf->vaddr);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static struct sg_table *get_sg_table(struct device *dev, struct dma_buf *buf,
>   				     enum dma_data_direction direction)
>   {
> @@ -159,6 +176,7 @@ static const struct dma_buf_ops udmabuf_ops = {
>   	.unmap_dma_buf	   = unmap_udmabuf,
>   	.release	   = release_udmabuf,
>   	.mmap		   = mmap_udmabuf,
> +	.vmap		   = vmap_udmabuf,
>   	.begin_cpu_access  = begin_cpu_udmabuf,
>   	.end_cpu_access    = end_cpu_udmabuf,
>   };