Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the jc_docs tree

[Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>]

Hi Mark.

On 9/28/26 7:28 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> 
>    Documentation/scheduler/index.rst
> 
> between commit:
> 
>    80c2913d0a06c ("sched/doc: add a preemption model overview")
> 
> from the jc_docs tree and commit:
> 
>    06a49ef784acf ("sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept")
> 
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc Documentation/scheduler/index.rst
> index d6d75421756ac,a43647b9706d9..0000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/scheduler/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/index.rst
> @@@ -23,6 -23,6 +23,7 @@@ Schedule
>        sched-stats
>        sched-ext
>        sched-debug
> +     sched-paravirt
>   +    sched-preemption
>    
>        text_files


Looks correct to me.
I guess it clashed since both were beginning around sched-p.

Sorry, I should have mentioned, But it didn't occur to me when I sent it.