From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754634AbYHUHSY (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:18:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757312AbYHUHSE (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:18:04 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.182]:29753 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757280AbYHUHSB (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:18:01 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=hI1xuORFE2ALk2xrKBuMdSb/F1JI4gSUCz0R958fmot3Y01tGIaTBpGk29nkENHHc1 cYe4p6OHa5d3YFzpPF3gYqHtRWY5fYCq8GDyaUK8QIB/UQRoOfvm7o/26bYGsce9fi8l 4CmxHyVn4kdlKMPaH1a+2i8XeaSeaVNm/J5rY= Message-ID: <2f11576a0808210018h157b0eddr1c327ecad8315cad@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:18:00 +0900 From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" To: "David Miller" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to # of CPUs Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cl@linux-foundation.org, tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com In-Reply-To: <20080821.001322.236658980.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080820195021.12E7.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080820200709.12F0.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080820234615.258a9c04.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080821.001322.236658980.davem@davemloft.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: c81fbb033ab4a141 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> sparc64 allmodconfig: >> >> mm/quicklist.c: In function `max_pages': >> mm/quicklist.c:44: error: invalid lvalue in unary `&' >> >> we seem to have a made a spectacular mess of cpumasks lately. > > It should explode similarly on x86, since it also defines node_to_cpumask() > as an inline function. > > IA64 seems to be one of the few platforms to define this as a macro > evaluating to the node-to-cpumask array entry, so it's clear what > platform Motohiro-san did build testing on :-) Thank you good advice. I don't have sparc64 machine but I can get borrowing x86 machine. So, I'll test on x86 today.