From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757886AbZABKAw (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 05:00:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757244AbZABKAo (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 05:00:44 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.180]:8703 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755541AbZABKAn (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 05:00:43 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=RR4c6y/jdVJFOC/S6f1ykj+rZslK1uE1bzEta1uGjFAGTXf7w/XgQqY0tH+syssS0U L5qWUNljf4inMZvecnThHMmpV97hCk61ZqBgrirkV2nBXWYlNlcIoZK9kHbe7PwAOB8f sXSt8eS5ngB8MkmmTBXjqIsVfxvbNwXBi+ehg= Message-ID: <2f11576a0901020200t3a6dadf5qa944432cd9fd8873@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 19:00:41 +0900 From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" To: "MinChan Kim" Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: stop kswapd's infinite loop at high order allocation take2 Cc: "Mel Gorman" , LKML , linux-mm , "Andrew Morton" , "Nick Piggin" , "wassim dagash" In-Reply-To: <28c262360901020155l3a9260b5h3c79d4b23a213825@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081231115332.GB20534@csn.ul.ie> <20081231215934.1296.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090101021240.A057.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <28c262360901020155l3a9260b5h3c79d4b23a213825@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 657d5a0cf9778e54 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Hi, kosaki-san. > > I read the previous threads now. It's rather late :(. > > I think it's rather awkward that sudden big change of order from 10 to 0. > > This problem causes zone_water_mark's fail. > It mean now this zone's proportional free page per order size is not good. > Although order-0 page is very important, Shouldn't we consider other > order allocations ? > > So I want to balance zone's proportional free page. > How about following ? > > if (nr_reclaimed < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) { > if (order != 0) { > order -=1; > sc.order -=1; > } > } > > It prevents infinite loop and do best effort to make zone's > proportional free page per order size good. > > It's just my opinion within my knowledge. > If it have a problem, pz, explain me :) Please read Nick's expalin. it explain very kindly :)