From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755515AbZCHD0p (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Mar 2009 22:26:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753224AbZCHD0g (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Mar 2009 22:26:36 -0500 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.174]:1510 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753210AbZCHD0f (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Mar 2009 22:26:35 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=YC03Y0hQrcgKt4hpyOJASPmOxjrN6MrnKDjIzG5BiOnawPhWfVmGFIGuKzZscixDb3 gxsGBd2nE4PD0RDCYXj/aLUSX0fxwuxu5SHVOIn8EvfMQYymxUaUeexvLlg2qbYD9CNr 9N9a89WWNSbfzLm+A9dHWdoT/jgQinWyOsqtI= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090307153427.GA6075@nowhere> References: <20090307235209.5A84.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090307153427.GA6075@nowhere> Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 12:26:33 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0d2f16dfddbb8c26 Message-ID: <2f11576a0903071926u3eeb793fx44300a0257439535@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH for tip] ftrace: remove latency_trace document From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2009/3/8 Frederic Weisbecker : > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 11:53:40PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> Subject: [PATCH] remove latency_trace document >> >> Currently, there aren't "Latency tracer" and latency_trace file. >> Then, its documentation is removed too. > > Hi, > > The latency_trace file has been removed but the latency tracing stil exists. > It has become an option instead of a file now: > > echo latency-format > /debugfs/tracing/trace_options > > There are even some tracers that default enable it (irqsoff, preemptoff...) > IMO, the documentation about latency tracing shouldn't be removed but > just updated a bit to reflect this change. Ah, sorry. I totally misunderstood it. thanks to correct my fault.