From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
gregkh@suse.de, npiggin@suse.de, mel@csn.ul.ie,
cl@linux-foundation.org, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
san@android.com, arve@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 08/11 -mmotm] oom: invoke oom killer for __GFP_NOFAIL
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:36:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0905120436k2e846494n802cf4cf6aefec7a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242106795.11251.286.camel@twins>
>> > Not sure it would help since the oom killer will be now be called for such
>> > an allocation and that dumps the stack (and will actually show the order
>> > and gfp flags as well).
>>
>> No, the intent of that warning is to find all call sites which use
>> __GFP_NOFAIL on order>0 so we can hunt down and eliminate them.
>>
>>
>> please review...
>
> Fully agreed, people should use banker's algorithm to guarantee
> progress, not create deadlocks with inf loops.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
me too.
>
>> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>
>> __GFP_NOFAIL is a bad fiction. Allocations _can_ fail, and callers should
>> detect and suitably handle this (and not by lamely moving the infinite
>> loop up to the caller level either).
>>
>> Attempting to use __GFP_NOFAIL for a higher-order allocation is even
>> worse, so add a once-off runtime check for this to slap people around for
>> even thinking about trying it.
>>
>> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-12 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-10 22:07 [patch 01/11 -mmotm] lowmemorykiller: Only iterate over process list when needed David Rientjes
2009-05-10 22:07 ` [patch 02/11 -mmotm] lowmemorykiller: Don't count free space unless it meets the specified limit by itself David Rientjes
2009-05-12 9:23 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-13 0:27 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2009-05-13 9:42 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-14 23:25 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2009-05-15 9:18 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-10 22:07 ` [patch 03/11 -mmotm] oom: cleanup android low memory killer David Rientjes
2009-05-10 22:07 ` [patch 04/11 -mmotm] oom: fix possible android low memory killer NULL pointer David Rientjes
2009-05-10 22:07 ` [patch 05/11 -mmotm] oom: fix possible oom_dump_tasks " David Rientjes
2009-05-11 21:11 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-11 21:28 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 21:41 ` Greg KH
2009-05-11 22:05 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-12 9:38 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-10 22:07 ` [patch 06/11 -mmotm] oom: move oom_adj value from task_struct to mm_struct David Rientjes
2009-05-11 0:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-11 0:26 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 1:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-11 8:43 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 21:19 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-12 9:56 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-10 22:07 ` [patch 07/11 -mmotm] oom: prevent possible OOM_DISABLE livelock David Rientjes
2009-05-11 21:22 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-10 22:07 ` [patch 08/11 -mmotm] oom: invoke oom killer for __GFP_NOFAIL David Rientjes
2009-05-10 23:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-11 0:24 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 1:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-11 7:40 ` Minchan Kim
2009-05-11 8:49 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 11:23 ` Minchan Kim
2009-05-11 8:45 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 16:03 ` Dave Hansen
2009-05-11 19:09 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 19:45 ` Dave Hansen
2009-05-11 20:21 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 21:29 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-11 21:45 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 22:11 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-11 22:31 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 22:46 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-11 23:00 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 23:14 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-11 23:37 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-12 5:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-12 11:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-05-12 10:05 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-10 22:07 ` [patch 09/11 -mmotm] oom: return vm size of oom killed task David Rientjes
2009-05-11 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-10 22:07 ` [patch 10/11 -mmotm] oom: avoid oom kill if no interruptible tasks David Rientjes
2009-05-11 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-11 23:08 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-10 22:07 ` [patch 11/11 -mmotm] oom: fail allocations if oom killer can't free memory David Rientjes
2009-05-12 21:14 ` Misleading OOM messages Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 9:29 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-14 19:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 20:38 ` Dave Hansen
2009-05-14 20:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 20:49 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-14 21:05 ` Dave Hansen
2009-05-14 21:12 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-14 21:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 21:34 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-14 21:41 ` Dave Hansen
2009-05-15 13:05 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-15 17:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-15 18:22 ` Dave Hansen
2009-05-15 19:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-15 20:02 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-15 21:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-19 20:39 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-22 13:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-22 14:17 ` Warn when we run out of swap space (was Re: Misleading OOM messages) Christoph Lameter
2009-05-22 14:56 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-22 19:01 ` Misleading OOM messages Christoph Lameter
2009-05-22 19:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-05-22 19:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-22 21:45 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-22 21:43 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-15 17:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-15 18:15 ` Dave Hansen
2009-05-15 18:19 ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-15 19:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-15 20:31 ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-18 14:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-18 15:45 ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-14 21:37 ` Dave Hansen
2009-05-14 22:00 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-15 17:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-15 18:23 ` Dave Hansen
2009-05-15 18:57 ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-15 19:37 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-14 20:56 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-12 9:09 ` [patch 01/11 -mmotm] lowmemorykiller: Only iterate over process list when needed Mel Gorman
2009-05-13 0:43 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f11576a0905120436k2e846494n802cf4cf6aefec7a@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=san@android.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome