Re: [PATCH v15 1/2] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun

["Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>]

On 4/7/2021 3:21 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 6/04/21 8:52 pm, Asutosh Das wrote:
>> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
>> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
>> But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun
>> during its runtime-suspend.
>> During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in
>> suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to resume, and never
>> comes out of it.
>> The commit
>> (d55d15a33: scsi: block: Do not accept any requests while suspended)
>> adds the check if the queue is in suspended state in blk_queue_enter().
>>
>> Call trace:
>>   __switch_to+0x174/0x2c4
>>   __schedule+0x478/0x764
>>   schedule+0x9c/0xe0
>>   blk_queue_enter+0x158/0x228
>>   blk_mq_alloc_request+0x40/0xa4
>>   blk_get_request+0x2c/0x70
>>   __scsi_execute+0x60/0x1c4
>>   ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode+0x124/0x1e4
>>   ufshcd_suspend+0x208/0x83c
>>   ufshcd_runtime_suspend+0x40/0x154
>>   ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend+0x14/0x20
>>   pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x3c
>>   __rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4
>>   rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614
>>   rpm_idle+0x158/0x228
>>   pm_runtime_work+0x84/0xac
>>   process_one_work+0x1f0/0x470
>>   worker_thread+0x26c/0x4c8
>>   kthread+0x13c/0x320
>>   ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>>
>> Fix this by registering ufs device wlun as a scsi driver and
>> registering it for block runtime-pm. Also make this as a
>> supplier for all other luns. That way, this device wlun
>> suspends after all the consumers and resumes after
>> hba resumes.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
> 
> v15 seems to be missing the updates to ufs_debugfs_get/put_user_access
> that were in v14:
> 
> 
> @@ -60,14 +60,14 @@ __acquires(&hba->host_sem)
>   		up(&hba->host_sem);
>   		return -EBUSY;
>   	}
> -	pm_runtime_get_sync(hba->dev);
> +	scsi_autopm_get_device(hba->sdev_ufs_device);
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   static void ufs_debugfs_put_user_access(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>   __releases(&hba->host_sem)
>   {
> -	pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev);
> +	scsi_autopm_put_device(hba->sdev_ufs_device);
>   	up(&hba->host_sem);
>   }
>   
> 
> Also from last comments, the issue below:
> 
> <SNIP>
> 
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> +static int ufshcd_wl_poweroff(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	ufshcd_wl_shutdown(dev);
> 
> This turned out to be wrong.  This is a PM op and SCSI has already
> quiesced the sdev's.  All that is needed is:
> 
> 	__ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba, UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM);
> 
> 
Yikes! Thanks, let me fix this and push the correct series.

-asd

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project