From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A727296BC5; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768302342; cv=none; b=Qeaa0PzCQxAX4H4cWZlwyiKxvpztihz2IK9E+ZjxDurNZdzsrj0vwZmbdbbL8jyWDpXjm9KlVrw4UTDbzLCyFnkYwwAUTcKZ1vyKpFL1GjMuF5QeBp5hxSD8yy/wbVLd1nKerBMkq7Vjegp59qzqvl5p4f9WJCj7cG5sgWxCgeU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768302342; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CzjdWSiaEsZbo6KTHjYNSxL+ISojl6DULDL7gFMMLWY=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=S6wDT/tcECWDbZTKfDcPTbHABQ2OZGp+0xv5l0IRLLM3o4AUMk7xm+b/CJwE4j61iwXyznirjsVxrsIp0D/gzQ5Z5Xba+7HfFKzS/ST5BKSMPGw8yXj34dStF/HGmkZLQfHKFVP8Iq/EHkuWTDSbb8/ix9iZa0rVgm6LjVUT6fc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=uURmhcIa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="uURmhcIa" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=gXYb/LxBq8s1hNblmNQTz4msl7CLCdfEmYzUVwYx2eI=; t=1768302341; x=1769511941; b=uURmhcIahkfA7jg9v+bW57pnHlL1VXcWixZvKATPQmelCBa d3zxVaTk02epCnNpv0+AYeMEydGuXslirTsLpVo9R7mPglmJZpGPOdSrtWielAqxd3wp291ZFoMnM ArgLnwqNk+VgGjQRb26DkPO7zaES6P8+FuKHLqXQM2iFYXjbJImknoa48t01FR42xu2PpS8S/mV/r BsJg4QCg3SYF5mfrsXJQZc7155Gc2nenRobPHA+kRuQUAFUt6+V9YsTmV0Kf+4qp76vA13C8Ntwrm Er9ZWO6INhm9DM3PDsQBkOyi2JRPMQC1YSP34bTq6ekrB/L7NLkKIUYrrla7M+3g==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vfcDM-0000000AjIc-46Rt; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:05:33 +0100 Message-ID: <2f4c22558d20b42615adde772551c1bfb346da47.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] replace system_unbound_wq, add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue From: Johannes Berg To: Marco Crivellari , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan , Frederic Weisbecker , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Michal Hocko Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:05:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20260113_112857_683696_3BB5BCB5) References: <20251113162032.394804-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (sfid-20260113_112857_683696_3BB5BCB5) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.2 (3.56.2-2.fc42) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Tue, 2026-01-13 at 11:28 +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 5:20=E2=80=AFPM Marco Crivellari > wrote: > > [...] > > Marco Crivellari (3): > > ath6kl: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users > > cw1200: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users > > wifi: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq > >=20 > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/usb.c | 2 +- > > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/bh.c | 5 +++-- > > net/wireless/core.c | 4 ++-- > > net/wireless/sysfs.c | 2 +- > > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >=20 > Gentle ping. I have none of these pending now - if I didn't accept them then they're lost. I did try to apply another similar one yesterday but it was already there in a slightly different format, so maybe things have gotten out of sync? johannes