From: Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
<Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: make dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll() static
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 09:51:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f93b254-2702-07b2-f5eb-26df4fa8abe0@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170802215011.GN20308@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
thanks
On 02-08-2017 22:50, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Carlos Palminha wrote:
>> Helper functions dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll don't need to be in global scope,
>> so make it static.
>>
>> Cleans up sparse warnings:
>> - symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> - symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Carlos Palminha <palminha@synopsys.com>
>
> Applied with acks from Joao and Jingoo to pci/host-designware for v4.14,
> thanks!
>
> I rewrapped these so they still fit in 80 columns, like the rest of the
> file.
>
>> ---
>> Patch made against linux-next tree, tag next-20170714
>>
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> index 0e03af279259..48d6d0712ea8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
>> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
>> }
>>
>> -void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
>> +static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
>> u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u32 size)
>> {
>> u32 retries, val;
>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ib_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
>> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
>> }
>>
>> -int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar,
>> +static int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar,
>> u64 cpu_addr, enum dw_pcie_as_type as_type)
>> {
>> int type;
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-03 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-17 13:13 Carlos Palminha
2017-07-17 13:27 ` Joao Pinto
2017-07-17 19:34 ` Jingoo Han
2017-08-02 21:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-03 8:51 ` Carlos Palminha [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f93b254-2702-07b2-f5eb-26df4fa8abe0@synopsys.com \
--to=carlos.palminha@synopsys.com \
--cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®