From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@cavium.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Elior, Ariel" <Ariel.Elior@cavium.com>,
"Tayar, Tomer" <Tomer.Tayar@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V2] qed: fix memory leak of a qed_spq_entry on error failure paths
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:28:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f9e0ee7-4c59-1b4b-ebeb-13ca52aa912a@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BL2PR07MB230615AAE3CF67DEBC6083778D930@BL2PR07MB2306.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
On 21/12/16 13:29, Mintz, Yuval wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>
>> A qed_spq_entry entry is allocated by qed_sp_init_request but is not kfree'd
>> if an error occurs, causing a memory leak. Fix this by returning the previously
>> allocated spq entry and also setting *pp_ent to NULL to be safe.
>>
>> Thanks to Yuval Mintz for suggestions on how to improve my original fix.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> We've given it a more thorough look, and apparently this isn't the correct fix.
> So I'll start by saying sorry for making you send this V2 needlessly.
>
> It boils down to the fact there are two kinds of SPQ entries -
> Those originating from the 'free_pool' and those from the 'unlimited_pending'.
> Only those originating from the free_pool should be returned
> using the qed_spq_return_entry(), as only those actually point to a valid
> dma-mapped memory where FW expects to find the entries;
> Returning the other kind would lead to assertions later,
> as driver would post a ramrod to FW which actually points to address 0.
>
> Looking at the error flows, it seems possible this isn't the only faulty
> error flow in the SPQ. I suggest you'd drop this and we'll take it from
> here [although if you really have the urge to continue - please do].
>
> Thanks,
> Yuval
>
>
Sure, lets drop my fixes, I'm out of time on this for 2016 anyhow.
Colin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-21 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-20 11:44 Colin King
2016-12-21 13:29 ` Mintz, Yuval
2016-12-21 14:28 ` Colin Ian King [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f9e0ee7-4c59-1b4b-ebeb-13ca52aa912a@canonical.com \
--to=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=Ariel.Elior@cavium.com \
--cc=Tomer.Tayar@cavium.com \
--cc=Yuval.Mintz@cavium.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®