From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
peterz@infradead.org, vschneid@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Subject: [patch] Re: [PowerPC][Linux-next][6.11.0-rc4-next-20240820] OOPs while running LTP FS Stress
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:09:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fb24ab402d9de45e3cf16e6ba0ad23a7843e5c1.camel@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82b9c434-a0fd-4488-95be-a45b8cd4b6e6@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2024-09-16 at 12:00 +0530, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote:
> Greetings!!!
Greetings,
> I am seeing below kernel crash from 6.11.0-rc4-next-20240820.
>
>
> Tried to do git bisect, but it didnt point to right patch. Attached is
> the bisect log.
>
> Any help in fixing this is much appriciated.
I met this, as well as other ways the wheels can fall off that turned
out to have the same root. I gave Peter a heads up with diag offline,
but having now convinced myself that all is well, I'll go ahead and
post a patchlet.
At the very least it's worth putting out for wider testing.. and should
anyone have something prettier in mind, yeah, do that instead.
sched: Fix sched_delayed vs cfs_bandwidth
Meeting an unfinished DELAY_DEQUEUE treated entity in unthrottle_cfs_rq()
leads to a couple terminal scenarios. Finish it first, so ENQUEUE_WAKEUP
can proceed as it would have sans DELAY_DEQUEUE treatment.
Fixes: 152e11f6df29 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue")
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6049,10 +6049,14 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cf
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
struct cfs_rq *qcfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
- if (se->on_rq) {
- SCHED_WARN_ON(se->sched_delayed);
- break;
+ /* Handle any unfinished DELAY_DEQUEUE business first. */
+ if (unlikely(se->on_rq && se->sched_delayed)) {
+ int flags = DEQUEUE_SLEEP | DEQUEUE_SPECIAL;
+
+ dequeue_entity(qcfs_rq, se, flags | DEQUEUE_DELAYED);
}
+ if (se->on_rq)
+ break;
enqueue_entity(qcfs_rq, se, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
if (cfs_rq_is_idle(group_cfs_rq(se)))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-19 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-16 6:30 Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2024-09-16 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-16 14:40 ` Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2024-09-19 6:09 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2024-09-19 14:39 ` [patch] " Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2024-09-20 2:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2024-10-01 1:34 ` [patch] sched: Fix sched_delayed vs cfs_bandwidth Mike Galbraith
2024-10-04 10:16 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2fb24ab402d9de45e3cf16e6ba0ad23a7843e5c1.camel@gmx.de \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=venkat88@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®