From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Kenneth Kabogo <kennethkabogo2@gmail.com>,
andersson@kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: mdt_loader: fix off-by-one heap overflow in segment name
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 14:23:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fb64437-e5e2-4c32-8ee5-6e81913789f7@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260912065651.59968-1-kennethkabogo2@gmail.com>
On 9/12/26 8:56 AM, Kenneth Kabogo wrote:
> mdt_load_split_segment() builds a segment firmware filename by
> overwriting the last three characters of a kstrdup'd copy of fw_name
> with "b%02d" formatted from segment. %02d is a minimum field width,
> not a cap: for segment in [0, 99] this produces exactly "bNN" + NUL,
> which fits the buffer, but for segment >= 100 it writes "b100" or
> wider, one or more bytes past the end of the kstrdup allocation.
>
> segment is not bounded to [0, 99] anywhere before this point. It is a
> raw index into the firmware's ELF program header table, ultimately
> bounded only by e_phnum, a 16-bit ELF field (max 65535). The existing
> check in mdt_header_valid() only verifies that the program header
> table fits inside the firmware file, not that e_phnum itself is sane,
> so a small firmware file can supply e_phnum > 100 and reach this path
> with segment >= 100 from either qcom_mdt_read_metadata() (the hash
> segment scan) or the main loadable-segment loop in
> qcom_mdt_load_no_init(), whenever the image uses the split-firmware
> convention.
>
> segment was never valid past 99 under this driver's own "bNN" naming
> scheme, so reject it outright instead of widening the buffer.
>
> Found by code inspection while auditing the Qualcomm PIL/PAS
> firmware-authentication flow. No reproducer beyond code inspection is
> available; I don't have affected hardware to trigger it on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Kabogo <kennethkabogo2@gmail.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-12 6:56 Kenneth Kabogo
2026-10-15 12:23 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2026-10-15 12:44 ` Abel Vesa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2fb64437-e5e2-4c32-8ee5-6e81913789f7@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=kennethkabogo2@gmail.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®