From: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
To: Maoyi Xie <maoyixie.tju@gmail.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jan Vaclav <jvaclav@redhat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] hsr: broadcast netlink notifications in the device's net namespace
Date: Sun, 31 May 2026 22:01:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fbe241d-16bb-4d63-82e0-a44523de5ee7@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHPEe=F+ii=GgNorkhYJYXZAa4akxjKxG+qFr_H-USQE1F8bRQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/31/26 12:23 PM, Maoyi Xie wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2026 07:18, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>> Not sure TBH, we'd need to take a ref on the netns and allocate
>> a tracker (on DEBUG kernels). One could go either way.
>
> On the RCU side, you're right that moving the net out of the lock
> means taking a ref, and this isn't a hot path where that really pays
> off. So I'd lean towards keeping it as posted, with the multicast
> still inside the rcu_read_lock. Fernando, thanks for the suggestion
> either way.
>
In such case:
Reviewed-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
Keep it if re-posted to net-next please.
Thanks!
>> I'm replying because I wanted to question whether this is Fixes+stable@
>> worthy. Sending the notifications to the namespace where the device is
>> makes sense. But it's as much a behavior changes as it is a fix.
>> The commit in question was merged to 5.6, real users clearly don't care.
>
> On the Fixes and stable tags, my thinking was that the init_net side
> is an information leak. A privileged listener there ends up seeing
> ring error and node down events from devices in other netns. The
> payload carries the peer MAC and the slave ifindex. That was my reason
> for tagging it.
>
> But I see your point that it is as much a behavior change as a fix,
> and if nobody has hit it since 5.6, the risk is clearly low. I don't
> feel strongly here. If you'd rather take it as a plain net-next
> improvement without the two tags, that is completely fine by me and I
> will respin it that way.
>
> Thanks,
> Maoyi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-31 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-18 6:44 hsr: netlink notifications leak across network namespaces Maoyi Xie
2026-05-27 7:59 ` [PATCH net] hsr: broadcast netlink notifications in the device's net namespace Maoyi Xie
2026-05-27 11:11 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-05-27 23:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-31 10:23 ` Maoyi Xie
2026-05-31 20:01 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2fbe241d-16bb-4d63-82e0-a44523de5ee7@suse.de \
--to=fmancera@suse.de \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jvaclav@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maoyixie.tju@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®