From: "Phy Prabab" <phyprabab@gmail.com>
To: "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about setting affinity in 2.4
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:14:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fe399760702182114v33f6825ckef91936c4a28b3f1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070219043927.GE943@1wt.eu>
Willy,
Thanks for the heads up and patch location. It looks like the guys at
RH seemed to have applied a patch to allow one to set affinity,
however, it might be that it is broken. Guess I will have to contact
the RH people to get an update as to what they did/did not do.
Thanks!
Phy
On 2/18/07, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> Hi Phy !
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 06:02:17PM -0800, Phy Prabab wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I am trying to set affinity on a program to make sure I can get the
> > best use of the cache as possible and to eliminate as much noise as
> > possible with running my program. I have tried unsuccessfully to set
> > affinity using sched_set/getaffinity and the CPU_SET macros. In
> > particular, I can not seem to get the process to use affinity I
> > specify as in:
> >
> > int main () {
> > cpu_set_t mask;
> > cpu_set_t setmask;
> > long long x;
> > double foo;
> > printf("Mask set to %08lx\n", sched_getaffinity(0, &mask));
> > CPU_SET(1, &mask);
> > if (sched_setaffinity(0, &mask) == -1) {
> > printf("error setting affinity.");
> > }
> >
> > printf("Mask is reset to %08lx\n", sched_getaffinity(0, &mask));
> > // do some long lasting calculations ....
> >
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > No mater what I do, the process is never bond to the processor in
> > question as exposed by this little appy and by cat /proc/<pid>/cpu.
> > Is this just impossible to do?
> >
> > Ah, the kernel I am using is RH 2.4.21-37.ELsmp.
>
> I don't know for RH kernel, but the affinity syscalls are not in 2.4
> mainline. You can apply the patch without much hassle if you want. It's
> in Robert Love's directory :
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/cpu-affinity/v2.4/
>
> I believe you'll have to use an -ac patch for RHEL.
>
> > TIA!
> > Phy
>
> regards,
> Willy
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-19 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-19 2:02 Phy Prabab
2007-02-19 4:39 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-02-19 5:14 ` Phy Prabab [this message]
2007-02-19 6:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-02-19 13:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-19 13:41 ` Pádraig Brady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2fe399760702182114v33f6825ckef91936c4a28b3f1@mail.gmail.com \
--to=phyprabab@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®