From: "Zqiang" <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Alexander Aring" <aahringo@redhat.com>
Cc: teigland@redhat.com, gfs2@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dlm: wait for outstanding SRCU callbacks to complete in exit paths
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 14:49:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ff0e6ca8e1e05078a69dbd2b2ccd1e62fc4650f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK-6q+gET5NPczHYexcGXgptGTVnynYuVWzdbDkpsuvnbrymLA@mail.gmail.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 10:30 AM Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 5:19 AM Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > The dlm_lowcomms_exit() and dlm_midcomms_exit() iterate over the
> > > srcu protected connection and node hash tables and hand each
> > > element to call_srcu() for deferred freeing (connection_release()
> > > and midcomms_node_release()). call_srcu() is asynchronous: the
> > > callbacks are invoked only after an SRCU grace period, which may
> > > happen after the exit function has already returned.
> > >
> > > These exit functions are reached from exit_dlm() on module unload.
> > > Once they return, module teardown continues and the module text
> > > may be unloaded while call_srcu() callbacks are still pending. When
> > > such a callback finally runs, it executes freed module code and
> > > touches the static SRCU domains that are being torn down, resulting
> > > in a use-after-free.
> >
> > I should rephrase it:
> >
> > Due to missed call to the srcu_barrier(), when invoke cleanup_srcu_struct()
> >
> Then there need to be a MUST call of srcu_barrier() before
> cleanup_srcu_struct() every time.
If there are some call_srcu() call, the srcu_barrier() should be called before cleanup_srcu_struct().
usually, when the cleanup_srcu_struct() run, we should ensure that there are no pending SRCU callbacks
or ongoing SRCU grace periods at this time.
there are another reason:
The midcomms_node_release() srcu callback can call call_rcu(), we must wait the all
call_rcu() to complete, because rcu_barrier() which in dlm_memory_exit() is required
to successfully intercept these RCU callbacks.
Thanks
Zqiang
>
> I am confused here.
>
> - Alex
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 9:18 Zqiang
2026-09-01 17:12 ` Alexander Aring
2026-09-02 13:21 ` Alexander Aring
2026-09-02 14:15 ` Zqiang
2026-09-02 14:29 ` Zqiang
2026-09-02 14:36 ` Alexander Aring
2026-09-02 14:49 ` Zqiang [this message]
2026-09-02 15:02 ` Alexander Aring
2026-09-02 14:30 ` Alexander Aring
2026-09-02 14:48 ` Alexander Aring
2026-09-02 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-02 17:13 ` Alexander Aring
2026-09-02 20:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ff0e6ca8e1e05078a69dbd2b2ccd1e62fc4650f@linux.dev \
--to=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®