From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5604258CE5 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:43:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791970997; cv=none; b=Sa7H63hRxjqwquWmKiBb5mV4r2JFvfXaU1+uafE5tPvj76y5h2CewKTIeDAXQRJsHljgeaKEXv/l9ie+7NE/0udmoqcstKl6Zjq+NAjEbc/2zP2hgjz9SjQBHJAiLU3hgkMCMfdFGybs7u37vlxdWQiagvK7Xs0kGkulBQdzJ+8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791970997; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/u9AYPaL2+ofC6n750AKptq4YtaPMhUQnmQw1XgZqz4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OTMYsK+Y4AIpqBLfBtFNiLFH1ybYa+4RKsFGA4PKuwRnuTyByTtSEe54SIZaTNXe8D9WTk+XEauZPaJSlWFeAaLoh1j8U1GCi2PC2H0W/hw2cBYQQP8oMeY1ZFOoN3s9gVOQLWBHNMoCYt7bzosXjnqCPqaWW3fAKxT1J86YPHE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TvHMT19c; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TvHMT19c" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3E471F008A4; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:43:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791970996; bh=H5SgPo1HKKa1EEOsG2iecS6xN05Y0dz7KAy0sbsqSs8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=TvHMT19cp3VI4WXyMxkIIIl/rLkbwnHjQpC0jxXIXIcVqdL9JKKmVSSbx0r6hV7NC Vrdpvz6qL4kqmdUa6ndhhBm547HYFlNtakrQ3150VOtqtxUgg/At6OYcKjKBZk+DZv vTHNv6FZ8qbfem4AYLoZguZfvTOcrfUV67OCW+gFpCPJKpbB99Tqo/D3vKkSz2WuNh vOWrjJzt4ic8ZI5b/0emBeZqAp8Vv1jjPYP+7Cil/RqS1xO96u9SkfKZBXadyOL6aJ clD/IfYffLkkLB6aXQpFPDbtUq6WSVhV9vCPzmBbfUcRE4h+1LFv2vb8qkbUou6csD GdwrM3es/LR9w== From: Pratyush Yadav To: Haolong Wang <18766350203@163.com> Cc: Pasha Tatashin , Mike Rapoport , Pratyush Yadav , Andrew Morton , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/memfd_luo: preserve the sealed exec-bit state; reject kernel-private shmem files In-Reply-To: <20261014035228.473825-1-18766350203@163.com> (Haolong Wang's message of "Wed, 14 Oct 2026 11:52:25 +0800") References: <20261014035228.473825-1-18766350203@163.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 11:43:13 +0200 Message-ID: <2vxzmrsgipn2.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Hi, I refuse to review this series. It looks entirely LLM generated with no quality controls at all. LLM generated content is fine, but you can't just post low quality patches and expect humans to spend time reviewing them. The commit messages are unreadable LLM ramblings, the code is all over the place and makes very little sense, you have made 3 versions in the same day, your cover letter doesn't even explain your use case and why you make this change, and so on. Future postings with similar quality will also be ignored. Please spend time to understand the kernel development process and spend _your own_ time understanding your code and polishing it. [...] -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav