From: Lorenzo Allegrucci <lenstra@tiscalinet.it>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] updated preempt-kernel
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 14:59:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20011020145906.01f60a00@pop.tiscalinet.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1003562833.862.65.camel@phantasy>
At 03.27 20/10/01 -0400, Robert Love wrote:
>Testers Wanted:
>
>patches to enable a fully preemptible kernel are available at:
> http://tech9.net/rml/linux
>for kernels 2.4.10, 2.4.12, 2.4.12-ac3, and 2.4.13-pre5.
>
>What is this:
>
>A preemptible kernel. It lowers your latency.
>
>What is New:
>
>* sync with new kernel releases
>
>* if HIGHMEM_DEBUG was on the preempt counter would be incremented at
>times but never decremented. this resulted in preemption becoming
>permanently disabled.
>
>* if HIGHMEM_DEBUG was not on, HIGHMEM would crash the system horribly
>due to a case where preemption was enabled without a corresponding
>disable.
>
>* reapply dropped hunk to pgalloc to prevent reentrancy onto per-CPU
>data
This above seems to have fixed some spontaneous reboots and oopses
I experiencied with 2.4.11 and 2.4.12-1 preempt-kernel patches.
>The next few patches are going to work on identifying any remaining
>per-CPU variables that need explicit locking under preemption.
>
> Robert Love
--
Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-20 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-20 7:27 Robert Love
2001-10-20 12:44 ` elko
2001-10-22 20:43 ` elko
2001-10-22 23:11 ` Robert Love
2001-10-23 15:13 ` elko
2001-10-23 15:40 ` Andre's PDC20269 support patch? J.R. de Jong
2001-10-20 12:59 ` Lorenzo Allegrucci [this message]
2001-10-20 17:02 ` [PATCH] updated preempt-kernel Robert Love
2001-10-22 15:32 ` bill davidsen
2001-10-22 18:39 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-22 23:08 ` Robert Love
2001-10-21 11:05 ` Colin Phipps
2001-10-21 15:24 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-21 18:16 ` Robert Love
2001-10-22 15:36 ` Taral
2001-10-21 18:23 ` Federico Sevilla III
2001-10-22 8:27 ` Jesper Juhl
2001-10-22 14:46 ` szonyi calin
2001-10-22 23:03 ` Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3.0.6.32.20011020145906.01f60a00@pop.tiscalinet.it \
--to=lenstra@tiscalinet.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®