From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Clemens Kolbitsch <clemens.kol@gmx.at>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Forbid deletion of memory mappings
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:50:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30071.1188510621@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:41:09 +0200." <200708302341.09459.clemens.kol@gmx.at>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1112 bytes --]
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:41:09 +0200, Clemens Kolbitsch said:
> On Thursday 30 August 2007 23:34:52 you wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Clemens Kolbitsch wrote:
> > > is there no way to tell the kernel, that a certain mapping must not be
> > > removed, no matter what (except of course an explicit call to sys_unmap,
> > > of course)?
> >
> > I don't seem to get what is the issue here. Your mapping is not removed,
> > only the VMAs are merged together into one larger VMA if they have
> > neighbouring address ranges and compatible protection bits. See
> > vma_merge().
>
> the thing is that they are not. the kernel chooses to REPLACE my mapping.
>
> consider the user-space code:
>
> mmap(0xaaaa0000, 0x3000, MAP_FIXED, ...);
> mmap(0xaaaa1000, 0x4000, MAP_FIXED, ...);
>
> here, the second call to mmap will shorten the first mapping to 0x1000 bytes
> and create one big vma with size 0x5000 bytes.
>
> is there a way to tell it that the second mmap MUST fail?
There's an LSM exit point for mmap, you could perhaps do something there.
What are you trying to achieve by forcing the second one to fail?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-30 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-30 16:44 Clemens Kolbitsch
2007-08-30 17:07 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-08-30 17:09 ` Clemens Kolbitsch
2007-08-30 21:32 ` Clemens Kolbitsch
2007-08-30 21:34 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-08-30 21:41 ` Clemens Kolbitsch
2007-08-30 21:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2007-08-30 22:05 ` Clemens Kolbitsch
2007-09-04 10:17 ` Helge Hafting
2007-09-04 10:29 ` Clemens Kolbitsch
2007-09-04 14:53 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-08-30 21:55 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30071.1188510621@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=clemens.kol@gmx.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®