Re: Generalising a transformation with SmPL?

[Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>]

…
> I found it easy to convert it also into the following small script variant
> for the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software).
>
>
> @adjustment@
> expression e, x;
> @@
> +of_node_put(e);
>  if (...)
>  {
>  <+... when != e = x
> -   of_node_put(e);
>  ...+>
>  }
> -of_node_put(e);
>
>
> 58 patches were accordingly generated for source files of the software “Linux next-20240913”.
…

This SmPL script references a known function name.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11-rc7/source/drivers/of/dynamic.c#L43

I imagine that it can become helpful to avoid duplicate function calls
also in combination with other functions.
But there are development challenges to consider for functions like mutex_unlock()
which get addresses passed for data structure members.
Thus I hoped that something can be achieved with the following script variant.


@extended_adjustment@
expression e, f, x, y;
@@
+f(e);
 if (...)
 {
 <+... when != \( e = x \| y(..., &e, ...) \)
(   f(&e);
|
-   f(e);
)
 ...+>
 }
(f(&e);
|
-f(e);
)


But the software combination “Coccinelle 1.2-00038-g2297fc0f” points details out
for further development considerations.

Markus_Elfring@Sonne:…/Projekte/Linux/next-analyses> spatch drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c …/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor/avoid_duplicate_function_call.cocci
…
previous modification:

  <<< f(e);
CONTEXT

According to environment 2:
   extended_adjustment.e -> pmu->mutex

   extended_adjustment.f -> mutex_unlock


current modification:

  <<< f(e);
CONTEXT

According to environment 2:
   extended_adjustment.e -> &pmu->mutex

   extended_adjustment.f -> mutex_unlock


exn while in timeout_function
extended_adjustment: already tagged token:
C code context
File "drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c", line 538, column 1, charpos = 14292
  around = 'if',
  whole content =       if (rockchip_pmu_domain_is_on(pd) != power_on) {



How can such a software situation be improved?

Regards,
Markus