From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A097DC43613 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:36:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBDB2089F for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:36:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728873AbfFXKgl (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 06:36:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34521 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726774AbfFXKgk (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 06:36:40 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F7A2307D98F; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-120-57.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.57]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE91B60605; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <20190619123019.30032-1-mszeredi@redhat.com> <20190619123019.30032-5-mszeredi@redhat.com> <1ea8ec52ce19499f021510b5c9e38be8d8ebe38f.camel@themaw.net> To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Ian Kent , Al Viro , Linux API , linux-fsdevel , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] vfs: don't parse "silent" option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <30204.1561372589.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:36:29 +0100 Message-ID: <30205.1561372589@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.48]); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Miklos Szeredi wrote: > What I'm saying is that with a new interface the rules need not follow > the rules of the old interface, because at the start no one is using > the new interface, so no chance of breaking anything. Er. No. That's not true, since the old interface comes through the new one. David