From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E63226E648; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 19:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740684062; cv=none; b=bzmFNItQxuN8PUXx7ts6Gf3jjHaJ8GJhlNdC/eVM5JqQbNaevk6B229viJsIcrb72BVA7RkrXdqGsYr48EpCQNGCMFtUR11mdIE1Izy4cErGnvx5llbkTrL2/4g1dr4n+8cJVap28DnIwtzxFRv2W6ofs7lOg8yCvSy6x3/zac8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740684062; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LAHYGW6aEdOPky0rkEil/TkK8FvlUee/5AdEvTj1Z8g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=W12eL5DtcYfCy8U+5beXwHPHnZ4QMtmHDv5ju00+s1iKVGmz275Ao9T8Xb6ezhi+f7LU2jFprO0y/oQcHJTVWvB6tuupOxewO1rxUXRCY1tA4O5w35Ra2ohx0GEZ3S5vaTOIaacrrjsgXtYMFQhADT6s8TiM5fkWBziJRB/Z4H8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b=nVizH7JB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b="nVizH7JB" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2nIp4OdR2z6qhnWaz8PyWS7YQAJ1zv2iXHLQMFhsuG0=; b=nVizH7JBdfpOazpQiOrbNj8tAP j9rufvbQMJimYcjaEfKd77ViNwf0qSPWJOVH/yUqtMt+OxFUXhRZdXrJFbvIce5YlwPsZvKu2zjO8 99uDyEjVdQo8q22Fz6W8v53xISBjS7lLqlMMkCpt1fR2r6o1imVUbzETr0FvZbIShSwGIyLc5elOq taaaNJuET4c7R95LkGIsad9vPH8/FP69c5jd6+kcYfsLiGSrgqvvMcLV8lwt5GiiSUwEs4CDM9zMY Rw13ZGBkkl57hbmB3fYm4LoT616yaZRZcmW+RIGdc2fpaahZHFxpCVQ9FJnAPmZswk9NdYxSeLihd OwLQF5DA==; Received: from i53875b47.versanet.de ([83.135.91.71] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tnjRF-0003cw-He; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 20:20:53 +0100 From: Heiko =?UTF-8?B?U3TDvGJuZXI=?= To: Jonas Karlman , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Yao Zi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: Add reset lookup table for RK3528 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 20:20:52 +0100 Message-ID: <3022099.BaHzMo0RvP@diego> In-Reply-To: References: <20250227175302.2950788-1-jonas@kwiboo.se> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2025, 19:47:12 MEZ schrieb Yao Zi: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 05:52:57PM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote: > > In the commit 5d0eb375e685 ("clk: rockchip: Add clock controller driver > > for RK3528 SoC") only the dt-binding header was added for the reset > > controller for the RK3528 SoC. > > > > Add a reset lookup table generated from the SRST symbols used by vendor > > linux-6.1-stan-rkr5 kernel to complete support for the reset controller. > > > > Thanks for completing the reset part! The patch looks good to me, but > > > Fixes: 5d0eb375e685 ("clk: rockchip: Add clock controller driver for RK3528 SoC") > > I wonder whether it deserves a Fix tag: to me it's more like a new > feature. Please correct me if I'm wrong. while one can see both sides, I agree that the Fixes is unnecessary in this case. I've applied the clock controller mere hours ago and it was not broken, just missing functionality ;-) I've applied the patch now, and removed the Fixes line. Heiko