From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/stacktrace: do not fail when regs on stack for ORC
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 08:34:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3024aa33-2ff8-1e43-6c33-0aa781202eba@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171130195939.gx2qlewwjprfql42@treble>
On 11/30/2017, 08:59 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 01:57:10PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 09:03:24AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> save_stack_trace_reliable now returns "non reliable" when there are
>>> kernel pt_regs on stack. This means an interrupt or exception happened.
>>> Somewhere down the route. It is a problem for frame pointer unwinder,
>>> because the frame might now have been set up yet when the irq happened,
>>> so it might fail to unwind from the interrupted function.
>>>
>>> With ORC, this is not a problem, as ORC has out-of-band data. We can
>>> find ORC data even for the IP in interrupted function and always unwind
>>> one level up.
>>>
>>> So introduce `unwind_regs_reliable' which decides if this is an issue
>>> for the currently selected unwinder at all and change the code
>>> accordingly.
>>
>> Thanks. I'm thinking there a few ways we can simplify things. (Most of
>> these are actually issues with the existing code.)
>>
>> - Currently we check to make sure that there's no frame *after* the user
>> space regs. I think there's no way that could ever happen and the
>> check is overkill.
>>
>> - We should probably remove the STACKTRACE_DUMP_ONCE() warnings. There
>> are some known places where a stack trace will fail, particularly with
>> generated code. I wish we had a DEBUG_WARN_ON() macro which used
>> pr_debug(), but oh well. At least the livepatch code has some helpful
>> pr_warn()s, those are probably good enough.
> ^^^^^^^
> meant to say pr_debug()s.
>
> Also adding the live patching mailing list as an FYI.
The changes are now in:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/linux.git/log/?h=devel
Letting 01 bot to run through them, then I will send a v2.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-01 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-30 8:03 Jiri Slaby
2017-11-30 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/stacktrace: make sure reliable stack trace reached userspace Jiri Slaby
2017-11-30 19:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/stacktrace: do not fail when regs on stack for ORC Josh Poimboeuf
2017-11-30 19:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-12-01 7:34 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2017-12-14 21:58 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-12-18 3:37 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-12-18 6:59 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-12-20 17:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-12-20 19:07 ` Jiri Slaby
2018-04-16 22:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-04-19 13:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-05-10 12:33 ` Jiri Slaby
2018-05-10 12:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-05-11 7:01 ` Jiri Slaby
2018-05-11 15:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-05-14 11:08 ` Jiri Slaby
2018-05-14 13:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-05-14 14:00 ` Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3024aa33-2ff8-1e43-6c33-0aa781202eba@suse.cz \
--to=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®