From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com, will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: diana.craciun@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: arm-smmu-impl: add NXP hook to preserve bootmappings
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 18:10:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30296756-9b8d-4851-87f0-8c4bd41110e9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125155009.18453-1-laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
On 2020-11-25 15:50, laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com wrote:
> From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
>
> Add a NXP specific hook to preserve SMMU mappings present at
> boot time (created by the boot loader). These are needed for
> MC firmware present on some NXP chips to continue working
> across kernel boot and SMMU initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c
> index 7fed89c9d18a..ca07d9d4be69 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c
> @@ -187,6 +187,36 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl mrvl_mmu500_impl = {
> .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> };
>
> +static int nxp_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> + int i, cnt = 0;
> + u32 smr;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_mapping_groups; i++) {
> + smr = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(i));
> +
> + if (FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_VALID, smr)) {
I bet this is fun over kexec...
Note that the Qualcomm special case got a bit of a free pass since it
involves working around a totally broken hypervisor, plus gets to play
the "nobody sane will run an enterprise distro on their phone" card to
an extent; I don't think the likes of Layerscape kit get it quite so easy ;)
> + smmu->smrs[i].id = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, smr);
> + smmu->smrs[i].mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK, smr);
> + smmu->smrs[i].valid = true;
> +
> + smmu->s2crs[i].type = S2CR_TYPE_BYPASS;
> + smmu->s2crs[i].privcfg = S2CR_PRIVCFG_DEFAULT;
> + smmu->s2crs[i].cbndx = 0xff;
> +
> + cnt++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + dev_notice(smmu->dev, "\tpreserved %d boot mapping%s\n", cnt,
> + cnt == 1 ? "" : "s");
That gets you around the initial SMMU reset, but what happens for the
arbitrarily long period of time between the MC device getting attached
to a default domain and the MC driver actually probing and (presumably)
being able to map and reinitialise its firmware?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct arm_smmu_impl nxp_impl = {
> + .cfg_probe = nxp_cfg_probe,
> +};
I believe you're mostly using MMU-500, so you probably don't want to
simply throw out the relevant errata workarounds.
> struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> {
> @@ -226,5 +256,8 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "marvell,ap806-smmu-500"))
> smmu->impl = &mrvl_mmu500_impl;
>
> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "nxp,keep-boot-mappings"))
> + smmu->impl = &nxp_impl;
Normally you'd get a "what about ACPI?" here, but given the number of
calls and email threads we've had specifically about trying to make ACPI
support for these platforms work, that gets upgraded to at least a "WHAT
ABOUT ACPI!?" :P
But seriously, the case of device firmware in memory being active before
handover to Linux is *literally* the original reason behind IORT RMRs.
We already know we need a way to specify the equivalent thing for DT
systems, such that both can be handled commonly. I really don't want to
have to support a vendor-specific mechanism for not-even-fully-solving a
completely generic issue, sorry.
Robin.
> +
> return smmu;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-25 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-25 15:50 laurentiu.tudor
2020-11-25 18:10 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2020-12-02 10:29 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2020-12-07 18:11 ` Robin Murphy
2020-12-08 7:02 ` Jon Nettleton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30296756-9b8d-4851-87f0-8c4bd41110e9@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=diana.craciun@nxp.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®