mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Matheus Izvekov" <mizvekov@gmail.com>
To: "Chris Wedgwood" <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"Dominik Brodowski" <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH (take #2)] i386: kill CONFIG_REGPARM completely
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 19:00:02 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <305c16960605201500s6153e1doad87e4b85f15b53f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060520212049.GA11180@taniwha.stupidest.org>

On 5/20/06, Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org> wrote:
> Take #2.
>
> Kill of CONFIG_REGPARM completely.
>
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt b/Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt
> index f39c9d7..ac11b81 100644
> --- a/Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt
> @@ -62,9 +62,8 @@ consider the following facts about the L
>        - different structures can contain different fields
>        - Some functions may not be implemented at all, (i.e. some locks
>         compile away to nothing for non-SMP builds.)
> -      - Parameter passing of variables from function to function can be
> -       done in different ways (the CONFIG_REGPARM option controls
> -       this.)
> +      - Parameter passing of variables from function to function can
> +       be done in different ways.

Why not kill those 2 lines too? Now that non-regparm is gone, it
doesnt make sense to say there are different ways to pass parameters,
there is only regparm now, right?

>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-20 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-20  2:53 [PATCH] i386: don't consider regparm EXPERIMENTAL anymore Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-20  9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-05-20 20:13   ` [PATCH] i386: kill CONFIG_REGPARM completely Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-20 21:07     ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-20 21:20     ` [RFC PATCH (take #2)] " Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-20 22:00       ` Matheus Izvekov [this message]
2006-05-20 23:24         ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-22 11:47         ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-05-23  7:55           ` Helge Hafting
2006-05-24 20:36           ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-05-29 19:03 ` [PATCH] i386: don't consider regparm EXPERIMENTAL anymore Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=305c16960605201500s6153e1doad87e4b85f15b53f@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mizvekov@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®