From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42F4C55178 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B7520829 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="pTkfiNOI" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1807576AbgJ0QLw (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:11:52 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:46346 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1804959AbgJ0QAK (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:00:10 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09RG03EB130507; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:00:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1603814403; bh=nJbxpEs1Sj02R3uv62Gtsp2WcPBFGlsuy6h1U+1SaRs=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=pTkfiNOICv4xNbuZAX/V7eRQNNC5QRCnC7iy9rAWdkgQbSFoFr6jkiLRAdYS4WS7F OBibz3Mq9eDnZKGjVFpgEtg2GoObVoncUk7P8a2DfI59w9fPa6girQD6PgVXFRbJey Bvmh3Eixx04b0Tgr59r+LJVAVDfUlsvSezRCWJ00= Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (dfle109.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.30]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 09RG02Bw000731 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:00:02 -0500 Received: from DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:00:01 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:00:01 -0500 Received: from [10.24.69.20] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09RFxwFY051252; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:59:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: Kconfig: Drop ARM64 SoC specific configs To: Nishanth Menon CC: Santosh Shilimkar , , , Swapnil Jakhade , Jyri Sarha , Yuti Amonkar , Tomi Valkeinen , Tero Kristo , Sekhar Nori , Peter Ujfalusi References: <20201026170624.24241-1-nm@ti.com> <20201026190808.im4nb32jn4rd3xhu@crayon> From: Lokesh Vutla Message-ID: <30760d91-cfe0-1b25-ab3d-2cb6a58f7b45@ti.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:29:57 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201026190808.im4nb32jn4rd3xhu@crayon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27/10/20 12:38 am, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 23:30-20201026, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > [..] >> ➜ linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC >> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:961:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC=y >> drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:7:config ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC >> ➜ linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC >> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:962:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC=y >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/Kconfig:16: depends on ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC || >> COMPILE_TEST >> drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:12:config ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC >> >> >> I see drm bridge Kconfig is cleaned[0]. Please clean the defconfig as well. >> >> [0] >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026165441.22894-1-nm@ti.com/ >> > > Yes, the defconfig patches have to be queued up in a different queue, > Lets see where the two patches fall and will post the defconfig > updates as well. Sure. IMHO, the cleanup patches should get merged before this Kconfig removal patch. Otherwise, this patch as-is looks good to me. Acked-by: Lokesh Vutla Thanks and regards, Lokesh