From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] sched / idle: Reduce the number of branches in the idle loop
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 15:54:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3084951.QaIkFrZ3VU@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
Hi,
The "reflect" variable that had to be added to cpuidle_idle_call() to fix a
regression during the 4.0 cycle has bothered me a bit since then and guess
what? It is not necessary.
After the last regression fix related to tick_broadcast_exit() I realized
that it should be possible to eliminate this variable by splitting
cpuidle_idle_call() into smaller routines and reordering the code in
question which is done by this patch series.
It also gets rid of one more redundant check while at it.
[1/4] Move the default idle call code into a separate function.
[2/4] Make cpuidle_reflect() check the sign of its index arg.
[3/4] Eliminate the "reflect" check from cpuidle_idle_call().
[4/4] Eliminate a redundant check of the cpuidle_enter() return value.
All on top of 4.1-rc2.
Thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-04 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-04 13:54 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2015-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched / idle: Move the default idle call code to a separate function Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-04 14:00 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-04 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-04 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-04 13:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: Check the sign of index in cpuidle_reflect() Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-04 14:02 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-04 13:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched / idle: Eliminate the "reflect" check from cpuidle_idle_call() Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-04 14:49 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-04 13:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched / idle: Call default_idle_call() from cpuidle_enter_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-04 15:04 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-04 21:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-04 14:25 ` [PATCH 0/4] sched / idle: Reduce the number of branches in the idle loop Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-04 21:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3084951.QaIkFrZ3VU@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®